Study on the Rheology of Foam Fracturing Fluid with Mixture Model

Article Preview

Abstract:

Numerical simulation study on the rheology or foam fluid was carried through by treating inner phase as granular fluid with mixture model. The simulation results show that the gas phase is well distributed on cross-section. Besides, the higher the foam quality, the higher the velocity gradient near the wall. For turbulent properties, the turbulent kinetic energy and viscosity increase as the foam quality increases. With the same foam quality, the bigger the bubble diameter, the higher the turbulent viscosity and turbulent kinetic energy. What’s more, the foam quality 63% is a catastrophe point at which the rheology of foam fracturing fluid changes sharply. The change trend of turbulent viscosity along radial direction is different between the regions where the foam quality is below and over catastrophe point, and in the latter the change trend is flatter. From the simulation results it can be seen that the mixture model is more applicable and effective to the region where foam quality is over 63%.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 512-515)

Pages:

1747-1752

Citation:

Online since:

May 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Shen Linhua. Rheology and heat transfer properties of foam fracturing fluid in the vertically downward tube [D]. Xi'an: Xi'an Jiaotong University, 2006.

Google Scholar

[2] Qian Zhiping. Foam Plastics [M]. Beijing: China Petrochemical Press, 1998.

Google Scholar

[3] Langevin D. Influence of interfacial rheology on foam and emulsion properties [J]. Anvances in Colloid and Interface Science, 2000, 88 (3): 209-222.

DOI: 10.1016/s0001-8686(00)00045-2

Google Scholar

[4] Harris PC. Effects of texture on rheology of foam fracturing fluids [J]. Journal of Engineering Mathematics, 2001,41(2):237-258.

Google Scholar

[5] Saintpere S. Rheological Properties of Aqueous Foams for Underbalanced Drilling [C]. The SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston TX, Oct 3-6, 1999.

DOI: 10.2118/56633-ms

Google Scholar

[6] Simon C, Denis W and James AG. The rheology of two-dimensional foams [J]. Rheol Acta, 2004, 43(5): 442-448.

Google Scholar

[7] Kern N, Weaire D, Martin A et al. Two-dimensional viscous froth model for foam dynamics [J]. Physical Review, 2004 70(4): 1-13.

DOI: 10.1103/physreve.70.041411

Google Scholar

[8] Yuan XF and Edwards SF. Flow behavior of two-dimensional random foam [J]. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech, 1995, 60(2): 335-348.

DOI: 10.1016/0377-0257(95)01393-0

Google Scholar

[9] Sun QC and Stefan H. Lattice gas simulations of two- dimensional liquid foams [J]. Rheol Acta, 2004, 43(5): 567-574.

DOI: 10.1007/s00397-004-0417-0

Google Scholar

[10] Durian DJ. Foam mechanical at bubble scale [J]. Physical Review Letters, 1995, 75(26): 4780-4783.

DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.75.4780

Google Scholar

[11] Pozrikidis C. Numerical investigation of the effect of surfactants on the stability and rheology of emulsions and foam [J]. Journal of Engineering Mathematics, 2001 41(2): 237–258.

Google Scholar

[12] Manninen M, Taivassalo V and Kallio S. On the mixture model for multiphase flow [J]. VTT Publications, 1996, 288: 951

Google Scholar

[13] Schiller L and Naumann.Z. Z. Ver. Deutsch. Ing.[M]. 1935, 77: 318.

Google Scholar

[14] Gidaspow D, Bezburuah R, and Ding J. Hydrodynamics of circulating fluidized beds: kinetic theory approach [C]. The 7th Engineering Foundation Conference on Fluidization, Gold Coast (Australia), May 3-8, 1992.

Google Scholar

[15] Lun CKK, Savage SB, Jerey DJ et al. Kinetic theories for granular flow: inelastic particles in couette flow and slightly inelastic particles in a general flow field [J]. J. Fluid Mech., 1984,140: 223-256.

DOI: 10.1017/s0022112084000586

Google Scholar

[16] Reidenbach VG, Harris PC, Lee YN, et al. Rheological study of foam fracturing fluids using nitrogen and carbon dioxide [J]. SPE Production Engineering, 1986, 1

DOI: 10.2118/12026-pa

Google Scholar