Effect of Chemical Fertilizer and Compost on Natural 15N Abundance of Tomato Leaves and Fruits

Article Preview

Abstract:

Organic farming is a good way to reduce environmental pollution. However, no related detection of fertilizer applications, which are extremely important in organic farming, exists. The δ15N value of chemical fertilizer (–3.8 to +2‰) is far lower than compost (>+10‰). Thus, natural 15N abundance (δ15N) in leaves and fruits may be used to reveal the application of N fertilizer. In this experiment, six treatments were laid out: 635 g (C1), 952 g (C2), and 1270 g (C3) of compost were applied as basal fertilizer in each pot. Alternately, 10.7 g (U1), 16 g (U2), and 21.3 g (U3) of urea were applied as basal fertilizer and 10.7 g (U1), 16 g (U2), and 21.3 g (U3) urea were applied as top-dressing, respectively, in each pot. C1 and U1, C2 and U2, and C3 and U3 had equal amounts of nitrogen fertilization. In all three fertilizer levels, the leaves and fruits sampled from the U group had significantly lower values than those sampled from the C group within the same period. The δ15N values of the leaves and fruits from the C group decreased slowly. The δ15N values of leaves sampled at 40 days after transplanting were fairly low. The δ15N values of leaves and fruits from the U group increased initially, due to the small amounts of urea left, which then led the plants to absorb N from the culture substrates. However, the δ15N values of leaves and fruits from the U group decreased rapidly after the top-dressing was applied, where the minimum values occurred during the final stage.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 524-527)

Pages:

2238-2241

Citation:

Online since:

May 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] R. Gentile, B. Vanlauwe, P. Chivenge and J. Six: submitted to Journal of Soil Biology & Biochemistry (2008)

Google Scholar

[2] Yu Li, Gang Wang: submitted to Journal of CHINESE JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY (2004) in Chinese.

Google Scholar

[3] Maria K. Magnusson, Anne Arvola, Ulla-Kaisa Koivisto Hursti and Lars Abergb: submitted to Journal of Appetite (2003)

Google Scholar

[4] Hanne Torjusen, Geir Lieblein, Margareta Wandel and Charles A. Francis: submitted to Journal of Food Quality and Preference (2001)

Google Scholar

[5] Anna Saba and Federico Messina: submitted to Journal of Food Quality and Preference (2003)

Google Scholar

[6] Young-Joo Kim, Woo-Jung Choi, Sang-Sun Lim and Jin-Hyeob Kwak : submitted to Journal of Bioresource Technology (2008)

Google Scholar

[7] Seok-In Yun and Hee-Myong Ro: submitted to Journal of Soil Biology & Biochemistry (2009)

Google Scholar

[8] Boli Guo, Yimin Wei and Jiarong Pan: submitted to Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences (2006) in Chinese.

Google Scholar

[9] Seok-In Yun, Hee-Myong Ro, Woo-Jung Choi and Scott X. Chang: submitted to Journal of Soil Biology & Biochemistry (2006)

Google Scholar