Supercritical CO2 Extraction of Tea Seed Oil from Camellia Seeds and Composition Analysis of Tea Seed Oil Extracts

Article Preview

Abstract:

The extraction of tea seed oil obtained from wild camellia seed using supercritical CO2 extraction has been investigated. The extraction was carried out under operation pressures of 20, 30, 35, 40 and 50 MPas at 45°C, with a supercritical fluid flow rate of 5mL•min-1. The collected extracts were analyzed and the relative compositions of the tea oil were determined by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry(GC-MS). The purpose of this work was to investigate the effect of operation pressure on the extraction yield, extraction time, and extract composition. The results from supercritical CO2 fluid extraction (SFE) showed that the extraction pressure positively related to the extraction yield and negatively and linearly related to the extraction time. Only 5 constituents were found in the extract under the pressure of 20 MPa. However, about 20 constituents in the extract were obtained under the pressure of 35 MPa, approximately the same as those under 50 MPa. The curve of the extraction pressure versus the extraction yield demonstrated that the extractable constituents of wide camellia seeds have two states: a free state and a bound state. In the bound state, extractable constituents can only be extracted under an extraction pressure above the threshold. Taking into consideration of the extraction yield, equipment, and operation, the appropriate pressure of the SFE is between 36.4 MPa and 40 MPa.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 538-541)

Pages:

2372-2376

Citation:

Online since:

June 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Y. B. Guo, B. Tang, and A. Y. Qiu: Journal of agricultural engineering (in Chinese), Vol. 24 (2008), p.249

Google Scholar

[2] Z. Y. Zhang: Research on the antioxidative and radiation-proof active constituents of the camellia oil and their mechanism (Ms.D., Zhejiang University, China 2006), p.24

Google Scholar

[3] Z. Z. Li, G. Q. She and H. M. Jiang: Daily-Use Chemical Industry (in Chinese), Vol. 37 (2007), pp.138-141.

Google Scholar

[4] E. Reverchon, I. D. Marco: Journal of Supercritical Fluids, Vol. 38 (2006), p.146

Google Scholar

[5] I. Papamichail, V. Louli and K. Magoulas: Journal of Supercritical Fluids, Vol. 18 (2000), p.213

Google Scholar

[6] U. Salgm: Journal of Supercritical Fluids, Vol.39 (2007), p.330

Google Scholar

[7] V. Y. Ixtaina, A. Vega and S. M. Nolasco: Journal of Supercritical Fluids, Vol.55 (2010), p.192

Google Scholar

[8] V. Louli, G. Folas, E. Voutsas and K. Magoulas: Journal of Supercritical Fluids, Vol. 30 (2004), p.163

DOI: 10.1016/j.supflu.2003.07.003

Google Scholar

[9] Y. S. Vicente, A. Cabanas and J. A.R. Renuncio: Journal of Supercritical Fluids, Vol.49 (2009), p.167

Google Scholar

[10] J. M. del Valle, O. Rivera and M. Mattea: Journal of Supercritical Fluids, Vol. 31 (2004), p.159

Google Scholar

[11] U. Salgm, O. Doker and A. Cahmh: Journal of Supercritical Fluids, Vol.38 (2006), p.326

Google Scholar

[12] E. Reverchon, C. Marrone: Journal of Supercritical Fluids, Vol.19 (2001), p.161

Google Scholar

[13] M. Izadifar, F. Abdolahi: Journal of Supercritical Fluids, Vol. 38 (2006), p.37

Google Scholar

[14] A. Berna, A. Tarrega and M. Blasco: Journal of Supercritical Fluids, Vol. 18 (2000), p.227

Google Scholar

[15] A. Rajaei, M. Barzegar and Y. Yamini: Eur Food Res Technol, Vol. 220 (2005), p.401

Google Scholar

[16] X. H. Wu, B. G. Chen and Y. F. Huang: Food science and technology, Vol. 32 (2007), p.139

Google Scholar