A Dynamic Contact Method in the LECEL Test for Heterogeneous Brittle Materials

Article Preview

Abstract:

Based on dynamic contact force and FEM, the contact – separation process of collision was investigated. Compared with other methods, the dynamic contact method needn’t modify the general stiffness matrix, and increase any additional iterative computation. So there should be less computation and high efficiency. By building simulation model LECEI(the technique of loading edge cracks by edge impact), the propagation of branching cracks were simulated. Compared with existing research results, the method can be suitable to the impact model such as LECEI.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 557-559)

Pages:

1423-1426

Citation:

Online since:

July 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Kalthoff J. Modes of dynamic shear failure in solids. Int J Fracture. Vol. 101 (2000), pp.1-31.

Google Scholar

[2] Kalthoff JF, Winkler S. Failure Mode Transition at High Rates of Shear Loading International Conference on Impact Loading and Dynamic Behavior of Materials1988. p.185-195s.

Google Scholar

[3] Zhou M, Ravichandran G, Rosakis AJ. Dynamically propagating shear bands in impact-loaded prenotched plates—II. Numerical simulations. J Mech Phys Solids. Vol. 44 (1996), pp.1007-1032.

DOI: 10.1016/0022-5096(96)00004-x

Google Scholar

[4] Armero F, Linder C. Numerical simulation of dynamic fracture using finite elements with embedded discontinuities. Int J Fracture. Vol. 160 (2009), pp.119-141.

DOI: 10.1007/s10704-009-9413-9

Google Scholar

[5] Li S, Liu WK, Rosakis AJ, Belytschko T, Hao W. Mesh-free Galerkin simulations of dynamic shear band propagation and failure mode transition. Int J Solids Struct. Vol. 39 (2002), pp.1213-1240.

DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7683(01)00188-3

Google Scholar

[6] Remmers JJC, de Borst R, Needleman A. The simulation of dynamic crack propagation using the cohesive segments method. J Mech Phys Solids. Vol. 56 (2008), pp.70-92.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmps.2007.08.003

Google Scholar

[7] Liu JB, Wang D. A contact force model on crack which can be touched in dynamic analysis-The newest developments in elastodynamics. Beijing: Beijing Science Press, 1995(in chinese).

Google Scholar

[8] Chen ZH, Tang CA, Fu YF. Infinite element simulation of catastrophe induced by evolution of rock microfracturing damage. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering. Vol. 20 (1998), pp.9-15.(in chinese).

Google Scholar

[9] Tang CA, Liu H, Lee PKK, Tsui Y, Tham LG. Numerical studies of the influence of microstructure on rock failure in uniaxial compression -- Part I: effect of heterogeneity. Int J Rock Mech Min. Vol. 37 (2000), pp.555-569.

DOI: 10.1016/s1365-1609(99)00121-5

Google Scholar

[10] Tang CA. Numerical simulation of progressive rock failure and associated seismicity. Int J Rock Mech Min. Vol. 34 (1997), pp.249-261.

DOI: 10.1016/s0148-9062(96)00039-3

Google Scholar

[11] Tang CA, Tham LG, Lee PKK, Tsui Y, Liu H. Numerical studies of the influence of microstructure on rock failure in uniaxial compression -- Part II: constraint, slenderness and size effect. Int J Rock Mech Min. Vol. 37 (2000), pp.571-583.

DOI: 10.1016/s1365-1609(99)00122-7

Google Scholar

[12] Bertram A, Kalthoff JF. Crack propagation toughness of rock for the range from low tovery high crack speeds. Key Engineering Materials. Vol. 251-252 (2003), pp.423-430.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.251-252.423

Google Scholar