Study on the Comprehensive Benefit of the Energy-Saving Social Security Houses

Abstract:

Due to the lack of money and information asymmetry, the energy-saving benefit of social security houses has been ignored in some regions. According to the Economic Evaluation Method and Parameters of Construction Projects (III), this paper has a discussion on the energy-saving security rooms from perspectives of financial benefit, national economic benefit and social benefit. The results show that there is a phenomenon of “market failure” in the field of energy-saving social security houses，and then the authors put forward to some suggestions for government.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 573-574)
• Pages: 902-907
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.573-574.902
• Online since: October 2012
• Authors: Xu Sheng Li, Chao Feng Shi
• Keywords: Energy Saving, Financial Benefit, Market Failure, National Economic Benefit, Social Benefit, Social Security Houses

References

[1] Baoxing Qiu. Six Fields with the Largest Building Energy-Saving Potential and their Out looking in China [J]. Architecture Technology, 2011, 42(1): 6-8.

[2] Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development, P.R. China. Energy Efficiency Design Standards of Residential Building [S]. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, (2008).

[3] Yuan Chang, Yaowu Wang. Analysis of building embodied energy and atmosphere impacts in China based on economic input-output life-cycle assessment model [J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2011, 44(5): 136-143.

[4] B. Latour. Re-assembling the Social [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, (2005).

[5] Yulan Yang, Baizhan Li, Runming Yao, Ning Kang. A Method for Energy Efficient Assessment and Labeling of Residential Buildings [J]. Architectural & Enviromental Engineering, 2010, 32(3): 105-112.

[6] Bo Yin, Yingzong Liu. Economic Externality Analysis of Market Failure in the Domain of Energy Efficiency in Buildings [J]. Journal of HuaZhong University of Science and Technology (Urban Science Edition), 2005, 22(4): 65-68.

[7] Lorna A. Greening, Michael Ting, Thomas J and Krackler. Effects of changes in residential end-uses and behavior on aggregate carbon intensity: Comparison of 10 OECD countries for the period 1970 through 1993[J]. Energy Economics, Vol. 23, 2001(1): 153-178.

DOI: 10.1016/s0140-9883(00)00059-1

[8] Yuming Liu. Cost-benefit analysis of energy efficiency improvement of existing residential buildings in heating regions based on LCCA [J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2011, 44(10): 118-123.

[9] Linlin Cui, Dalu Tan, Ying Liu. Application of PPP Mode for Low-Income Housing in Chengdu [J]. Journal of Engineering Management, 2011, 25(4): 454-457.

[10] Seppala A, Assad MEH, Kapanen T. Optimal structure for heat and cold protection under transient heat conduction[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2008, 36(4): 355-363.

DOI: 10.1007/s00158-007-0171-x

[11] Ryghany M, Sorensen KH. How energy efficiency fails in the building industry [J]. Energy Policy, 2009, 37(3): 984-991.

DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.11.001