Morphological Structure of Pretreated Organo Layer Silicate Dispersion in Masterbatch Biodegradable Polymer Cassava Starch Clay Nanocomposite

Article Preview

Abstract:

Biodegradable polymer using inexpensive renewable resources such as starch produced poor mechanical, barrier properties and transparency of product, these properties were the important parameter for packaging material. This research intended to study the effect of glycerol monostearate (GMS) treated organo layer silicate (OLS) in biodegradable polymer starch masterbatch to eliminate the inferior properties. Focus was in morphological structure of biodegradable polymer starch clay nanocomposite. Biodegradable polymer starch clay nanocomposite was prepared using Haake Rheomix Polydrive at a temperature of 100 °C for 5 minutes and screw speed 60 rpm and the product was used as masterbatch to get a better dispersion of OLS in the matrix. Masterbatch was formulated with the parameter of 35 %, 45 % and 50 % starch and 3.5 % of OLS. Morphological structure of biodegradable polymer starch clay nanocomposite was characterized using Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM), Atomic Force Microscope (AFM) and X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) to observe the dispersion and compatibility of the organo layer silicate in biodegradable nanocomposite matrix. XRD analysis provided the dispersion of organo layer silicate at 35% starch was better than 45% starch and 50% starch in materbatch. This was consistent with the SEM and AFM result, masterbatch containing 50% starch had interfere the OLS dispersion and produced agglomeration of organo layer silicate. SEM images of masterbatch with 50 % loading level of starch shown structure that starch not completely thermoplasticized.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

157-162

Citation:

Online since:

December 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] H. Liu, F. Xie, L. Yu: Progress in Polymer Science Vol. 34 (2009), p.1348.

Google Scholar

[2] M. Sujka, J. Jamroz: Food Science and Tech Vol. 42 (2009), p.1219.

Google Scholar

[3] M.B. Cardoso, J.L. Putaux, Y. Nishiyama: Biomacromolecules Vol. 8 (2007), p.1319.

Google Scholar

[4] L.P.B.M. Janssen, L. Mościcki: Acta Sci. Pol. Technica Agararia 5 (1) (2006), p.19.

Google Scholar

[5] M. Avella, J.J. De Vlieger, M.E. Errico: Food Chem Vol. 93 (2005), p.467.

Google Scholar

[6] M.J. Ridout, A.P. Gunning, M.L. Parker: Carbohydrates Polymer Vol. 50 (2002), p.123.

Google Scholar

[7] S. Chuayjuljit, S. Hosililak, A. Athisart: Journal of Metals, Materials and Minerals Vol. 19 No. 1 (2009), p.59.

Google Scholar

[8] H.M.C. de Azeredo: Food Research International 42 (2009), p.1240.

Google Scholar

[9] C. Liza, B. Soegijono, E. Budianto, Procedia Chemistry 4 (2012), p.47.

Google Scholar

[10] P. Čapková, M. Pospíšil, M. Valáskova: J Colloid Interface Sci Vol. 300 (2006), p.264.

Google Scholar

[11] R.A. Vaia, E.P. Giannelis: Macromolecules Vol. 3 (1997), p.7990.

Google Scholar

[12] V.K. Nguyen, S.H. Jin, S.H. Lee: Composite Interfaces Vol. 13 (2006), p.299.

Google Scholar

[13] K.S. Sandhu, N. Singh: Food Chemistry Vol. 101 (2007), p.1499.

Google Scholar

[14] S.H. Park, K.C. Eom, S.Y. Yoo, Nano-structural Characteristics of Gelatinized Starch Granule (The 9th Esafs, Korea 2009).

Google Scholar

[15] U.V. Lay Ma, J.D. Floros, G.R. Ziegler: Carbohydrates Polymer Vol. 83 (2011), p.1757.

Google Scholar

[16] H. Heinz, R.A. Vaia, R. Krisnamoorti: Chem Mater Vol. 19 (2007), p.59.

Google Scholar