The Influence of Spin Orientation and Alloying on Magnetism and Work Function for Fe_x-1Mn_x/Fe (001) Films

Abstract:

By using first-principles methods based on density functional theory (DFT), we investigated the magnetism and work function of Fe_x-1Mn_x/Fe (001) films with different spin arrangements (parallel (PL), antiparallel (APL1) and mixed (APL2)) for Mn and Fe atoms. The calculation shows that the spin arrangement and alloying have evident impact on the work function and moment of Fe_x-1Mn_x/Fe (001) films. For Mn/Fe (001), the spin arrangement affects evidently the geometrical structure, work function and magnetism of the system. Moreover, the work function for non-magnetic (NM) state is found to be higher than that for magnetic state, and the work function of Mn/Fe (001) with PL state is less than that with APL2 state. For Fe_x-1Mn_x/Fe (001), with increased Mn doping content, the Fe moments in the second layer decrease and their values are all less than the bulk value of Fe atom, which is due to the antiferromagnetic coupling between Mn and Fe atoms. Furthermore, we found that the surface alloying can have an impact on the work function of Fe_x-1Mn_x/Fe (001), but the role of spin polarization is also quite important.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volume 629)
• Pages: 229-235
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.629.229
• Online since: December 2012
• Authors: Ke Qin Tang, Ke Hua Zhong, Yan Ming Cheng, Zhi Gao Chen, Zhi Gao Huang
• Keywords: Alloying, First-Principle, Magnetism, Spin Arrangement, Work Function

References

[1] Peacock PW, Robertson J. Bonding, energies, and band offsets of Si–ZrO2 and HfO2 gate oxide interfaces. Phy Rev Lett 2004; 92: 057601.

[2] Dong YF, Feng YP, Wang SJ, Huan ACH. Impact of interface structure on Schottky-barrier height for Ni∕ ZrO (001) interfaces. Phys Rev B 2005; 72: 045327.

DOI: 10.1063/1.1891285

[3] Hobbs C, Fonseca LRC, Knizhnik A, Dhandapani V, Samavedam SB, Taylor WJ et al. Fermi-level pinning at the polysilicon/metal oxide interface-Part I. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2004; 51: 971.

DOI: 10.1109/ted.2004.829513

[4] Park S, Colombo L, Nishi Y, Cho K. Ab initio study of metal gate electrode work function. Appl Phys Lett 2005; 86: 073118.

DOI: 10.1063/1.1865349

[5] De I, Johri D, Srivastava A, Osburn CM. Impact of gate workfunction on device performance at the 50 nm technology node. Solid-StateElectron 2000; 44: 1077.

DOI: 10.1016/s0038-1101(99)00323-8

[6] Dong YF, Wang SJ, Feng YP, Huan ACH. Chemical tuning of band alignments for metal gate/high-κ oxide interfaces. Phys Rev B 2006; 73: 045302.

DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.73.045302

[7] Alshareef HN, Choi K, Wen HC, Luan H, Harris H, Senzaki Y et al. Composition dependence of the work function of Ta1-xAlxNy metal gates. Appl Phys Lettt 2006; 88: 072108.

DOI: 10.1063/1.2174836

[8] Ren C, Chan DSH, Wang XP, Faizhal BB, Li MF, Yeo YC et al. Physical and electrical properties of lanthanide-incorporated tantalum nitride for n-channel metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistors. Appl. Phys. Lett 2005; 87: 073506.

DOI: 10.1063/1.1947901

[9] Ishii R, Matsumura K, Sakai A, Sakata T. Work function of binary alloys. Appl Surf Sci 2001; 658: 169–170.

DOI: 10.1016/s0169-4332(00)00807-2

[10] Tsui BY. Wide Range Work Function Modulation of Binary Alloys for MOSFET Application. IEEE Electron Device Lett 2003; 24: 153.

DOI: 10.1109/led.2003.809528

[11] Xu GG, Wu QY, Zhang JM, Chen ZG, Huang ZG. First-principles study of the adsorption energy and work function of oxygen adsorption on Ni (111) surface. Acta Phys Sin 2009; 58: (1924).

DOI: 10.7498/aps.58.1924

[12] Xu GG, Wu QY, Chen ZG, Huang ZG, Wu RQ , Feng YP. Disorder and surface effects on work function of Ni-Pt metal gates. Phys Rev B 2008; 78: 115420.

DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.78.115420

[13] Ohnishi S, Freeman AJ. Surface magnetism of Fe (001). Phys Rev B 1983; 28: 6741.

[14] Fu CL, Freeman AJ. Surface ferromagnetism of Cr(001). Phys Rev B 1986; 33: 1755.

[15] Alden M, Mirbt S, Skriver HL, Rosengaard NM , Johansson B. Surface magnetism in iron, cobalt, and nickel. Phys Rev B 1992; 46: 6303.

DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.46.6303

[16] Rader O, Gudat W. Electronic structure of two-dimensional magnetic alloys: c(2×2) Mn on Cu(100) and Ni(100). Phys Rev B 1997; 55: 5404.

DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.55.5404

[17] Yamada TK , Bischoff MMJ, Mizoguchi T, Kempen HV. STM and STS study of ultrathin Mn layers on Fe(001). Surf Sci 2002; 516: 179.

DOI: 10.1016/s0039-6028(02)02032-0

[18] Payne MC, Teter MP, Allan DC, Arias TA, Joannopoulos JD. Iterative minimization techniques for ab initio total-energy calculations: molecular dynamics and conjugate gradients. Rev Mod Phys 1992; 64: 1045.

DOI: 10.1103/revmodphys.64.1045

[19] Kresse G, Furthmuller J. Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput Mater Sci 1996; 6: 15.

DOI: 10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0

[20] Kresse G, Joubert D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys Rev B 1999; 59: 1758.

DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.59.1758

[21] Perdew J, Zunger A. Self-interaction correction to density-functional approximations for many-electron systems. Phys Rev B 1981; 23: 5048.

DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.23.5048

[22] S.L. Dudarev, G.A. Botton, S.Y. Savrasov, C.J. Humphreys, A.P. Sutton. Electron-energy-loss spectra and the structural stability of nickel oxide: An LSDA+ U study. Phys. Rev. B1998; 57: 1505.

DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.57.1505

[23] Stojic NL. Phase stability of Fe and Mn within density-functional theory plus on-site Coulomb interaction approaches. J. Magn. Magn. Mater 2008; 320: 100.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2007.05.011

[24] Methfessel M, Paxton AT. High-precision sampling for Brillouin-zone integration in metals. Phys Rev B 1989; 40: 3616.

DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.40.3616

[25] Press WH, Flannery BP, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT. New Numerical Recipes. 2nd ed. New York. Cambridge University Press; (1986).

DOI: 10.1007/bf01321860

[26] Hafner J, Spišák D. Ab initio investigation of the magnetism of tetragonal Mn: Bulk, surface, ultrathin films, and multilayers. Phys Rev B 2005; 72: 144420.

DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.72.144420

[27] Acet M, Zahres H, Wassermann EF, Pepperhoff W. High-temperature moment-volume instability and anti-Invar of γ-Fe. Phys Rev B 1994; 49: 6012.

DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.49.6012

[28] Kittel C. Introduction to Solid State Physics. seventh ed. New York. Wiley; (1996).

[29] Turner AM, Chang YJ, Erskine JL. Surface States and the Photoelectron Spin Polarization of Fe (100). Phys Rev Lett 1982; 48: 348.

DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.48.348