A Review of Contact Sensors Used for Monitoring Malodorous Gas in Animal Facilities

Article Preview

Abstract:

Animal facilities produce large amounts of harmful gases, and many of them have a pungent odor such as ammonia, hydrogen sulfide and other malodorous gases. The malodorous gases generated by animal house not only affect the health of people and livestock but also pollute the air. The detection of the malodorous gases can effectively improve efficiency of livestock production and reduce environmental pollution. More and more gas detection method is applied to the detection of the malodorous gases generated by animal house. This paper summarizes contact sensors for monitoring of malodorous gases in animal house recently, including semiconductor sensors electrochemical sensors and electronic nose. The basic principle and the characteristics of these methods were illustrated and the applications on the detection of malodorous gases in animal house were described. Meanwhile, the researches of malodorous gases monitoring for livestock production applied contact sensors were listed. The status quo and future development of the contact sensors for malodorous gases generated by animal house were summarized.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

655-661

Citation:

Online since:

December 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Ni JQ, Heber AJ, Darr MJ, Lim TT, Diehl CA, Bogan BW. Air quality monitoring and on-site computer system for livestock and poultry environment studies. T ASABE 2009; 52: 937-947.

DOI: 10.13031/2013.27391

Google Scholar

[2] National Research Council (U.S. ), Air emissions from animal feeding operations: current knowledge, Future Needs. Washington DC.: The National Academies Press; (2003).

DOI: 10.17226/10586

Google Scholar

[3] Heber AJ, Ni JQ, Lim TT, Schmidt AM, Koziel JA, Tao PC, et al. Quality assured measurements of animal building emissions: gas concentrations. J Air Waste Manage 2006; 56: 1472-1483.

DOI: 10.1080/10473289.2006.10465680

Google Scholar

[4] Schiffman SS, Bennetta JL, Raymer JH. Quantfication of odors and odorants from swine operations in North Carolina. Agr Forest Meteorol 2001; 108: 213-240.

DOI: 10.1016/s0168-1923(01)00239-8

Google Scholar

[5] O'Neill DH, Phillips VR. A review of the control of odour nuisance from livestock buildings: Part 3. Properties of the odorous substances which have been identified in livestock wastes or in the air around them. J Agr Eng Res; 1992, 51: 157-165.

DOI: 10.1016/0021-8634(92)80072-z

Google Scholar

[6] Schiffman SS, Auvermann BW, Bottcher RW. In Rice JM, Caldwell DF, Humenik FJ, editors. Animal Agriculture and the Environment: National Center for Manure and Animal Waste Management White Papers, St. Joseph, Michigan: ASABE; 2006, pp.225-262.

DOI: 10.13031/aae2006.2013

Google Scholar

[7] Sun Y, Clanton CJ, Janni KA and Malzer GL, Sulfur and nitrogen balances in biofilters for odorous gas emission control. T ASAE 2000; 43: 1861-1875.

DOI: 10.13031/2013.3091

Google Scholar

[8] Nahm KH, Current pollution and odor control technologies for poultry production. Avian. Poult. Biol Rev 2003; 14: 151-174.

DOI: 10.3184/147020603783637472

Google Scholar

[9] Zhang RH, Yamamoto T and Bundy DS, Control of ammonia and odors in animal houses by a ferroelectric plasma reactor. IEEE T Ind Appl 1996; 32: 113-117.

DOI: 10.1109/28.485821

Google Scholar

[10] Schmidt DR, Jacobson LD, Janni KA, Continuous monitoring of ammonia, hydrogen sulfide and dust emissions from swine, dairy and poultry barns. ASAE Meeting Paper No. 024060. St. Joseph, Mich.: ASAE; (2002).

DOI: 10.13031/2013.10575

Google Scholar

[11] Sweeten JM, Odor measurement technology and applications: A state-of-the-art review. In Proc. 7th International Symposium on Agricultural and Food Processing Wastes Conference. St. Joseph, Mich.: ASAE; 1995, pp.214-229.

Google Scholar

[12] Ni JQ and Heber AJ, Sampling and measurement of ammonia concentration at animal facilities-A review. ASAE Meeting Paper No. 01-4090. St. Joseph, Mich.: ASAE; (2001).

Google Scholar

[13] Noboru Y. Toward innovations of gas sensor technology. Sensor Actuat B-Chem 2005; 108: 2-14.

Google Scholar

[14] Xu J,Han J,Sun Yu-an,Xie B. The progress in sensing mechanism of semiconductor gas sensors. Transducer and Microsystem Technologies 2006; 25: 5-8. (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[15] Hussain OM, Rao KS. Characterization of activated reactive evaporated MoO3 thin films for gas sensor applications. Mater Chem Phys 2003; 80: 638-646.

DOI: 10.1016/s0254-0584(03)00101-9

Google Scholar

[16] Stankova M, Vilanova X, Llobet E, Calderer J, Bittencourt C, Pireaux JJ, et al. Influence of the annealing and operating temperatures on the gas-sensing properties of rf sputtered WO3 thin-film sensors. Sensor Actuat B-Chem 2005; 105: 271-277.

DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2004.06.009

Google Scholar

[17] Lee SW, Tsai PP, Chen H. Comparison study of SnO thin- and thick-film gas sensors. Sensor Actuat B-Chem 2000; 67: 122-127.

Google Scholar

[18] Hieua NV, Kim HR, Ju BK, Lee JH. Enhanced performance of SnO2 nanowires ethanol sensor by functionalizing with La2O3. Sensor Actuat B-Chem 2008; 133: 228-234.

DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2008.02.018

Google Scholar

[19] Du N, Zhang H, Chen B, Ma X, Liu Z, Wu J, et al. Porous indium oxide nanotubes: layer-by-layer assembly on carbon-nanotube templates and application for room-temperature NH3 gas sensors. Adv Mater 2007; 19: 1641-1645.

DOI: 10.1002/adma.200602128

Google Scholar

[20] Wei S, Zhang Y, Niu X, Jiang K. Development of Fe2O3 gas-sensing material. Components & Materials 2008; 27: 1-4. (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[21] Chen DH, Jiao XL, Chen DR. Solvothermal synthesis of α-Fe2O3 particles with different morphologies. Mater Res Bull 2001; 36: 1057-1064.

DOI: 10.1016/s0025-5408(01)00582-7

Google Scholar

[22] Neri G, Bonavita A, Galvagno S, Caputi L, Pacile D, Marsico R, et al. HREELS study of Au/Fe2O3 thick film gas sensors. Sensor Actuat B-Chem 2001; 80: 222-228.

DOI: 10.1016/s0925-4005(01)00905-4

Google Scholar

[23] Kotsikau D, Ivanovskaya M, Orlik D, Orlik D, Falasconi M. Gas-sensitive properties of thin and thick film sensors based on Fe2O3-SnO2 nanocomposites. Sensor Actuat B-Chem2004; 101: 199-206.

DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2004.02.051

Google Scholar

[24] Kawashima S, Yonemura S. Measuring ammonia concentration over a grassland near livestock facilities using a semiconductor ammonia sensor. Atmos Environ 2001; 35: 3831-3839.

DOI: 10.1016/s1352-2310(01)00145-5

Google Scholar

[25] Li IH, Gao LA. Remote monitoring system of henhouse harmful gases. ICCASM 2010; 15: 176-178.

DOI: 10.1109/iccasm.2010.5622570

Google Scholar

[26] Wen WM. Development of an indoor toxic gas monitoring system. Master's thesis, Xi'an University of Technology; 2008. (in chinese).

Google Scholar

[27] Gardner JW, Philip N. A brief history of electronic noses. Sensor Actuat B-Chem, 1994; 18: 210-211.

Google Scholar

[28] Wheeler EF, Zajaczkowski JS, Topper PA, Gates RS, Xin H, Casey KD, et al. Ammonia emissions from broiler houses in Pennsylvania during cold weather. Proceedings of International Symposium on Gaseous and Odour Emissions from Animal Production Facilities. Horsens, Denmark: CIGR; (2003).

DOI: 10.13031/2013.20064

Google Scholar

[29] Xin H, Liang Y, Tanaka A, Gates RS, Wheeler EF, Casey KD, Heber AJ, et al. Ammonia emissions from U.S. poultry houses: Part I-measurement system and techniques. ASAE Meeting Paper No. 701P1403. St. Joseph, Mich.: ASAE; (2003).

DOI: 10.13031/2013.15501

Google Scholar

[30] Predicala BZ, Cortus EL, Fengler R, Christianson SK. Assessing the performance of hydrogen sulfide monitoring devices and a water spray method to reduce worker exposure in swine buildings. ASAE Meeting Paper No. 064150. St. Joseph, Mich.: ASAE; (2006).

DOI: 10.13031/2013.21147

Google Scholar

[31] Wilhelm LR, Milner JM, Snyder SD, McKinney DB. An instrumentation system for environmental measurements in broiler and swine housing. Appl Eng Agric 2001; 17: 677-681.

DOI: 10.13031/2013.6918

Google Scholar

[32] Fairchild BD, Worley JW, Czarick M, Ritz CW. Effects of heavy application of litter amendment on broiler house ammonia concentration. ASAE Meeting Paper No. 064187. St. Joseph, Mich.: ASAE; (2006).

DOI: 10.13031/2013.21181

Google Scholar

[33] Muhlbauer RV, Swestka RJ, Burns RT, Xin HW, Hoff S, Li H. Development and testing of a hydrogen sulfide detection system for use in swine housing. ASAE Meeting Paper No. 084203. St. Joseph, Mich.: ASAE; (2008).

DOI: 10.13031/2013.25089

Google Scholar

[34] Scott SM, James D, Ali Z. Data analysis for electronic nose systems. Microchim Acta 2007; 156: 183-207.

DOI: 10.1007/s00604-006-0623-9

Google Scholar

[35] Aleixandre M, Lozano J, Gutiérrez J, Sayago I, Fernández MJ, Horrillo MC. Portable e-nose to classify different kinds of wine. Sensor Actuat B-Chem 2008; 131: 71-76.

DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2007.12.027

Google Scholar

[36] Stella R, Barisci JN, Serra G, Wallace GG, Rossi D De. Characterisation of olive oil by an electronic nose based on conducting polymer sensors. Sensor Actuat B-Chem 2000; 63: 1-9.

DOI: 10.1016/s0925-4005(99)00510-9

Google Scholar

[37] Osuna RG, Schiffman SS, Nagle HT. Correlation of sensory analysis with electronic nose data for swine odor remediation assesment. Proceedings of the 3rd European Congress on Odours, Metrology and Electronic Noses, Paris, France, (2001).

Google Scholar

[38] Pan LL, Yang SX. A new intelligent electronic nose system for measuring and analysing livestock and poultry farm odours. Environ Monit Assess 2007; 135: 399-408.

DOI: 10.1007/s10661-007-9659-5

Google Scholar

[39] Pan LL, Liu R, Peng SH, Chai Y, Yang SX. An wireless electronic nose network for odours around livestock farms. 14th International Conference on Mechatronics and Machine Vision in Practice, M2VIP; (2007).

DOI: 10.1109/mmvip.2007.4430745

Google Scholar

[40] Pan LL, Yang SX. An electronic nose network system for online monitoring of livestock farm odors. Ieee-Asme T Mech 2009; 14: 371-376.

DOI: 10.1109/tmech.2009.2012850

Google Scholar