A Study of Amplifying Ovarian Cancer Biomarkers Concentration by an Ultrasonic Device

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper reported a method of amplifying ovarian biomarkers concentration. Ultrasound device radiated to ovarian cancer cell to amplify the concentration of the biomarkers in the blood, achieving early diagnosis of ovarian cancer. The device used digital frequency generator technique and adaptive load technology to produce frequency(1MHz), duty cycle (50%), power(0.3W/cm2). This study used the device to produce ultrasound exposure on vitro ovariancancer cell and determined the concentration of CA125 and CA19-9 in the blood after ultrasound exposure. The results show that the device can produce stable frequency and ultrasound power. The device radiated vitro ovarian cancer cell 5min, the biomarker CA125 concentration amplified 2.02 fold and CA19-9 concentration amplified 4.21 fold compare with no radiation ovarian cancer cell. This project developed a device for amplifying ovarian cancer biomarkers concentration which can amplify two or more biomarkers concentration simultaneously.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 634-638)

Pages:

1332-1337

Citation:

Online since:

January 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] J. Permuth-Wey, T.A. Sellers: Methods in Molecular Biology. 472 (2009) 413-37.

Google Scholar

[2] F. Salehi, L. Dunfield, K.P. Phillips, D. Krewski, B.C. Vanderhyden: Journal of Toxicology and Environment Health, Part B. 11 (2008) 301-321.

Google Scholar

[3] D. Neesham: Australian Family Physician. 36 (2007) 126-128.

Google Scholar

[4] M.M. Fields, E. Chevlen: Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing. 10 (2006) 77–81.

Google Scholar

[5] M. Donach, Y.H. Yu, G. Artioli, G. Banna, W.W. Feng, R.C. BastJr, Z. Zhang, M.O. Nicoletto: Tumor Biol. 31 (2010) 209-215.

DOI: 10.1007/s13277-010-0032-x

Google Scholar

[6] E. Somigliana, P. Vigano, A.S. Tirelli, I. Felicetta, E. Torresani, M. Vignali, A.M. DiBlasio: Human Reproduction. 19 (2004) 1871–1876.

Google Scholar

[7] A. PissaiaJr, D. Bernard, O. Scatton, O. Soubrane, F. Conti, Y. Calmus,: Transplantation Proceedings. 41 (2009) 682-684.

Google Scholar

[8] M.J.A. Engelen, H.W. A. de Bruijn, H. Hollema, K.A. ten Hoor, P.H.B. Willemse, J.G. Aalders, A.G. J. van der Zee: Gynecologic Oncology. 78 (2000) 16-20.

DOI: 10.1006/gyno.2000.5811

Google Scholar

[9] C. Charpin, A.K. Bhan, V.R. Zurawski Jr, R.E. Scully: International Journal of Gynecological Pathology. 1 (1982) 231-245.

Google Scholar

[10] N. Takeshima, Y. Shimizu, S. Umezawa, Y. Hirai, J.T. Chen, I. Fujimoto, K. Yamauchi, K. Hasumi: Gynecologic Oncology. 54 (1994) 321-326.

DOI: 10.1006/gyno.1994.1217

Google Scholar

[11] H.J. Li, W.J. Hong, R. Zhang, L.Y. Wu, L.Y. Liu, W.H. Zhang: Chinese Medical Journal. 115 (2002) 1496-1500.

Google Scholar

[12] A. Gadducci, P. Capriello, M. Ferdeghini, A. Madrigalia, A. Puccetti, C. Annicchiarico, C. Prontera, R. Bianchir, P. Fioretti: Cancer Journal. 4 (1991) 249-253.

Google Scholar

[13] A.L. D'Souza, J.R. Tseng, K.B. Pauly, S. Guccione, J. Rosenberg, S.S. Gambhir, G.M. Glazer: PANS. 106 (2009) 17152-17157.

Google Scholar