Repair Purchase Intention in Product Harm Crisis

Article Preview

Abstract:

Because of defective manufacturing processes and systems, product harm crises are likely to occur more often recently. Product harm crisis is likely to affect specific attribute- or non-attribute-based brand associations. It has been confirmed that exposure of product harm crisis weakens consumers’ satisfaction, purchase intention, and evaluation of the corporation as well as brand equity. Response strategy is of key importance to alleviate damage caused by product harm crisis. To resolve product harm crisis, manger should select the appropriate response strategy according to seriousness of product harm crisis. This paper suggested that managers should use a combination of response strategies for product harm crisis, according to the empirical findings based on defective manufacturing processes and systems.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 655-657)

Pages:

2266-2269

Citation:

Online since:

January 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] W. T. Coombs and S. J. Holladay.An extended examination of the crisis situations: A fusion of the relational management and symbolic approaches", Journal of Public Relations Research, vol. 13(2001), p.321–340.

DOI: 10.1207/s1532754xjprr1304_03

Google Scholar

[2] M. Dahlen and F. Lange.A disaster is contagious: How a brand in crisis affects other brands", Journal of Advertising Research, vol. 46(2006), p.388–397.

DOI: 10.2501/s0021849906060417

Google Scholar

[3] H. Van Heerde, K. Helsen, and M. G. Dekimpe. The impact of a product-harm crisis on marketing effectiveness: Marketing Science, Vol. 26(2007), p.230.

DOI: 10.1287/mksc.1060.0227

Google Scholar

[4] M. G. Weinberger, J. B. Romeo, and A. Piracha. Negative product safety news: Coverage, responses, and effects: Business Horizons, Vol. 34(1991), p.23–31.

DOI: 10.1016/0007-6813(91)90091-9

Google Scholar

[5] R. Ahluwalia, H. R. Unnava, and R. E. Burnkrant. The moderating role of commitment on the spillover effect of marketing communications: Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 38(2001), p.458–470.

DOI: 10.1509/jmkr.38.4.458.18903

Google Scholar

[6] C. Pullig, R. G. Netemeyer, and A. Biswas. Attitude basis, certainty, and challenge alignment: A case of negative brand publicity: Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 34(2006), p.528–542.

DOI: 10.1177/0092070306287128

Google Scholar

[7] C. Stammerjohan, C. M. Wood, Y. Chang, and E. Thorson. An empirical investigation of the interaction between publicity, advertising, and previous brand attitudes and knowledge: Journal of Advertising, Vol. 34(2005), p.55–67.

DOI: 10.1080/00913367.2005.10639209

Google Scholar

[8] P. M. Herr, F. R. Kardes, and J. Kim. Effects of word-of-mouth and product-attribute information on persuasion: An accessibility-diagnosticity perspective: Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 17(1991), p.454–462.

DOI: 10.1086/208570

Google Scholar

[9] P. Wright and B. Weitz. Time horizon effects on product evaluation strategies: Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 14(1977), p.429–443.

DOI: 10.1177/002224377701400401

Google Scholar

[10] R. Thaler. Mental accounting and consumer choice: Marketing science, Vol. 4(1985), p.199–214.

Google Scholar

[11] E. Walster, E. Berscheid, and G. W. Walster. New directions in equity research: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 25(1973), p.151–176.

DOI: 10.1037/h0033967

Google Scholar

[12] C. Moorman, G. Zaltman, and R. Deshpande. Relationships between providers and users of market research: the dynamics of trust within and between organizations: Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 29(1992), p.314–328.

DOI: 10.1177/002224379202900303

Google Scholar

[13] J. Blodgett and G. Jeffrey. The effects of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice on postcomplaint behavior: Journal of Retailing, Vol. 73(1997), p.185–210.

DOI: 10.1016/s0022-4359(97)90003-8

Google Scholar

[14] P. Strelan, N. T. Feather, and I. McKee. Justice and forgiveness: Experimental evidence for compatibility: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 44(2008), p.1538–1544.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2008.07.014

Google Scholar

[15] C. Fornell and B. Wernerfelt. Defensive marketing strategy by customer complaint management: a theoretical analysis: Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 24(1987), p.337–346.

DOI: 10.1177/002224378702400401

Google Scholar

[16] D. H. Dean. Consumer reaction to product harm crisis: Journal of Business Communication, Vol. 41(2004), p.192–211.

Google Scholar

[17] A. S. Mattila. The impact of service failures on customer loyalty: International Journal of Service Industry Management, Vol. 15(2004), p.134–49.

DOI: 10.1108/09564230410532475

Google Scholar

[18] J. C. Anderson and D. W. Gerbing. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach.: Psychological bulletin, Vol. 103(1988), p.411–423.

DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411

Google Scholar