The Research Methods Based on Emergy Theory of the Value of Natural Capital

Article Preview

Abstract:

Emergy is the condensation by the energy forming substances, is the new achievements of development of systems ecology and ecological economics in recent years. This article briefly describes the generating process of energy value theory and analysis methods, and makes a discussion on theory of emergy and regard the energy input of natural process as nature’s work. The value of substance is the condensation of work. Use the emergy as the main Dimensionless to measure the value, and regard natural ecosystems as natural capital. We discussed the new developments of the international ecology Emergy analysis methods and principles, and pointed out that the theoretical research and practical application has important scientific significance and application.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

353-357

Citation:

Online since:

February 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Lamb B L. Quantifying instream flows: matching policy and technology. Instream Flow Protection in the West[M]. Island Press, Covelo, CA, 1989, 23~29.

Google Scholar

[2] Bovee K D. A guide to stream habitat analyses using the instream flow incremental methodology[A]. Instream flow information paper No. 12. FWS/OBS-82/26, Co-operative Instream Flow Group[C]. US Fish and Wildlife Service, Office of Biological Services.

DOI: 10.3133/wri984157

Google Scholar

[3] Stalnaker C B, Lamb B L, Hemiksen J, et d. The instream flow incremental methodology: a primer for IHM[M]. National Ecology Research Center, Intemational Publication, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA, 1994, 99.

Google Scholar

[4] Orth D J, Maughan O E. Evaluation of the incremental methodology for recommending instream flows for fishes[J]. Trans Am Fish Soc. 111(4): 413~445.

DOI: 10.1577/1548-8659(1982)111<413:eotimf>2.0.co;2

Google Scholar

[5] King J M, Tharme R E. Assessment of the Instream Flow Incremental Flow Methodology and initial development of alternative Instream Flow methodologies for South Mrica[J]. Water Research Commission Report. 1994, 295(1): 590.

Google Scholar

[6] Gieseeke J, Jorde K. Ansatze zur Optimiemng yon Mindestab flubrege lungen in Ausleitungs streeken[J]. Wasser wirtschaft. 1997, 87: 232~237.

Google Scholar

[7] Krystyna A. Stave. A system dynamics model to facilitate public understanding of water managementoptions in Las Vegas, Nevada. Journal of Environmental Management, 2003, 67(4): 303-313.

DOI: 10.1016/s0301-4797(02)00205-0

Google Scholar

[8] Slobodan P. Simonovic. World water dynamics: global modeling of water resources. Journal of Environmental Management, 2002, 66(11): 249-267.

DOI: 10.1016/s0301-4797(02)90585-2

Google Scholar

[9] Shen, Jianfa. Urban and Regional Development in Post-reform China: The Case of Zhujiang Delta[J]. Progress in Planning, 2002(57): 26-27.

DOI: 10.1016/s0305-9006(01)00022-8

Google Scholar

[10] Collados, Cecilia&Duane, Timothy P. Natural Capital and Quality of Life: a Model for Evaluating the Sustainability of Alternative Regional Development Paths[J]. Ecological Economics, 1999}(30): 45-48.

DOI: 10.1016/s0921-8009(99)00020-8

Google Scholar

[11] L. Haibin,F. Yushun,W. Cheng. A survey of workflow management. Journal of Software, 2000, 11(7): 899-907.

Google Scholar

[12] Jianwei Yin. Research&Implement of WideFlow Web-based Intelligent Distributed Flexible Workflow Management System. 2001(57): 29-44.

Google Scholar