The Evaluation Model of Dangerous Reservoirs Treatment

Abstract:

At present, the treatment effect evaluation is mostly used to evaluate the result of dangerous reservoirs reinforcement which belongs to the post-evaluation. Due to the large quantity, difficult treatment, and limited funds of dangerous reservoirs in our country, this paper proposes the priority evaluation model of dangerous reservoirs treatment which belongs to the pre-evaluation. And in the paper the endangering degree index is added into the previous technology-based evaluation system to make it more close to reality. The information entropy theory is used to determine the weights of index system, and the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method is used to confirm the order of dangerous reservoirs treatment in a range. At last a case study is given to verify the feasibility and practicability of the model. It provides scientific basis for program decision-making.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 671-674)
• Pages: 3044-3048
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.671-674.3044
• Online since: March 2013
• Authors: Jian Wen Huang, Juan Mei Qin, Da Lin Lu, Rong Luo
• Keywords: Dangerous Reservoir, Endangering Degree Index, Evaluation Model, Priority

References

[1] YANG Qigui, GAO Dashui. Prospect and status of reinforcement technology of dangerous reservoir in China[J]. Yangtze River, 2011, 42(12): 6-11.

[2] Ministry of Water Resources of the People's Republic of China. The national special planning for reinforcement of the nationwide risky reservoirs[R]. Ministry of Water Resources of the People's Republic of China. (2007).

[3] CHEN Chaoxu, PENG Qi, WEI Min. Main problems and countermeasures in reinforcement design of dangerous reservoirs[J]. Yangtze River, 2011, 42(12): 81-84.

[4] ZHANG Shichen, YANG Zhenghua, GUO Cunjie. Study on countermeasures of risk elimination and strengthening for dangerous reservoirs in China[J]. Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering, 2010, 41(4): 82-86.

[5] Ministry of Water Resources of the People's Republic of China. SL258-2000, the dam safety evaluation guide[S]. Ministry of Water Resources of the People's Republic of China. (2000).

[6] NIU Xinqiang. Some important issues of dam safety and safety management and countermeasures[J]. Yangtze River, 2011, 42(12): 1-5.

[7] XU Jiuping, WU Wei. Multi-attribute decision-making theory and method[M]. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2000, 45-48: 73-76.

[8] ZENG Ling, ZENG sanyun. Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making Method with Alternative Priority[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory&Practice, 2007, 27(5): 113-118.

[9] Ahmet Can Kutlu, Mehmet Ekmekcioglu. Fuzzy failure modes and effects analysis by using fuzzy TOPSIS-based fuzzy AHP[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2012(39): 61-67.

DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.06.044