Cutting Force, Temperature and Wear Behavior in Dry Machining of Nodular Cast Iron with Si3N4/TiC Micro-Nano-Composite Ceramic Tool

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this paper, a type of Si3N4/TiC micro-nanocomposite ceramic tool materials were fabricated via hot pressing technique by adding Si3N4 and TiC nanoparticles. Cutting forces, temperature and wear behavior in dry machining of nodular cast iron with Si3N4/TiC micro-nanocomposite ceramic tool were investigated, in comparison with a commercial Sialon ceramic tool. Turning experiments were carried out at three different cutting speeds, which were 110, 175, and 220 m/min. Feed rate ( f ) and depth of cut (ap) were kept fixed at 0.1 mm/rev and 0.5 mm. The results show that the radial thrust force (Fy) become the largest among the three cutting force components (Fx , Fy and Fz), and Fy is the most sensitive to the changes of feed rate and depth of cut. In dry cutting of nodular cast iron, the cutting tool temperature rise rapidly with increase in cutting speed. The cutting temperature reach nearly 1000°C at the cutting speed of 220 m/min. The two types of ceramic tools have similar cutting performance, while the Si3N4/TiC micro-nanocomposite tool exhibits a better cutting performance than that of the Sialon tool. The wear rate of Si3N4/TiC micro-nanocomposite ceramic cutting tool is mainly dominated by the abrasion, while the wear rate of Sialon ceramic cutting tool is dominated by the abrasive action, and pullout of grains.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

267-271

Citation:

Online since:

June 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] M.C. Jeng: J. Mater. Sci. Vol. 28 (1993), pp.6555-6561

Google Scholar

[2] M. Cavallini, O. Di Bartolomeo and F. Iacoviello: Eng. Fract. Mech. Vol. 75 (2008), pp.694-704

Google Scholar

[3] R. Krishnamurthy, V. Sivasankaran: Key Eng. Mater. Vol. 96 (1994), p.221

Google Scholar

[4] A. Ahmad-Yazid, Z. Taha and I.P. Almanar: Sci. Res. Essays Vol. 5 (2010), pp.412-427

Google Scholar

[5] B. Beake, G. Fox-Rabinovich: Int. Heat Treat. Surf. Eng. Vol. 5 (2011), pp.17-20

Google Scholar

[6] G. Górny, R. Pampuch, L. Stobierski, et al.: Adv. Sci. Technol. Vol. 65 (2011), pp.56-60

Google Scholar

[7] Z.J. Lü, X. Ai, and J. Zhao: J. Mater. Sci. Technol. Vol. 21 (2005), p.899

Google Scholar

[8] R. Riedel, E. Ionescu and I. Chen: Ceram. Sci. Technol. (2011), pp.1-38

Google Scholar

[9] A.H. Jones, R. Dobedoe and M. Lewis: J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. Vol. 21 (2001), pp.969-980

Google Scholar

[10] Z.J. Lü, Z. Zhao and X. Ai: J. Chin. Ceram. Soc. Vol. 36 (2008), pp.210-214

Google Scholar

[11] A. Rendtel, H. Hübner, M. Herrmann, et al.: J. Am. Ceram. Soc. Vol. 81 (1998), pp.1109-1120

Google Scholar

[12] X.S. Li, I.M. Low: Key Eng. Mater. Vol. 96 (1994), pp.81-136

Google Scholar

[13] A.E. Diniz, R. Micaroni: Int. J. Mach. Tool Manu. Vol. 42 (2002), pp.899-904

Google Scholar

[14] E.M. Trent, P.K. Wright, Metal cutting 2000: Butterworth-Heinemann.

Google Scholar

[15] W. Grzesik: Wear Vol. 266 (2009), pp.1021-1028

Google Scholar

[16] M.I. Jones, K. Hirao, H. Hyuga, et al.: J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. Vol. 23 (2003), pp.1743-1750

Google Scholar

[17] J.X. Deng, C.T. Kun and L.L. Li: J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. Vol. 25 (2005), pp.1073-1079

Google Scholar