Performance Evaluation of Fiber-Optic Dosimeter According to Current-Time Product of Digital Radiography System

Article Preview

Abstract:

A fiber-optic dosimeter was developed using a plastic scintillating fiber, a plastic optical fiber, and a photomultiplier tube for measuring entrance surface dose over the low-energy range which is interested in diagnostic radiology. To evaluate the fabricated fiber-optic dosimeter, the scintillating light signals were measured by changing the current-time product whose values were determined by tube current and irradiation time of a digital radiography system. In conclusion, the trend of scintillating light signals of the fiber-optic dosimeter was similar with that of the entrance surface doses of a commercially available semiconductor dosimeter according to the current-time product.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 718-720)

Pages:

576-579

Citation:

Online since:

July 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] B.J. Mcparland, Entrance skin dose estimates derived from dose-area product measurements in interventional radiological procedures, Br. J. Radiol. 71 (1998) 1288-1295.

DOI: 10.1259/bjr.71.852.10319003

Google Scholar

[2] A.K. Jones, D.E. Hintenlang, Potential clinical utility of a fibre optic-coupled dosimeter for dose measurements in diagnostic radiology, Rad. Prot. Dosim. 132 (2008) 80-87.

DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncn252

Google Scholar

[3] D.E. Hyer, R.F. Fisher, D.E. Hintenlang, Characterization of a water-equivalent fiber-optic coupled dosimeter for use in diagnostic radiology, Med. Phys. 36 (2009) 1711-1716.

DOI: 10.1118/1.3116362

Google Scholar

[4] L.A. Benevides, A.L. Huston, B.L. Justus, P. Falkenstein, L.F. Brateman, D.E. Hintenlang, Characterization of a fiber-optic-coupled radioluminescent detector for application in the mammography energy range, Med. Phys. 34 (2007) 2220-2227.

DOI: 10.1118/1.2736788

Google Scholar

[5] American Association of Physicists in Medicine, AAPM Report 31. (1990)

Google Scholar