Use of Solid Digestate as a Growing Medium for Tomato Seedlings

Article Preview

Abstract:

The aim of this investigation was to evaluate solid digestate as a growing substrate for plug seedlings. Four mediums prepared from solid digestate, vermiculite, perlite and activated carbon were used to determine optimum growing substrate for tomato seedlings (Zhongshu six). The substrate used in this study mixed as solid digestate: vermiculite: perlite: activated carbon were (m:m): 4:13:2:1, 8:9:2:1, 12:5:2:1 and 16:1:2:1, respectively. Besides, peat: vermiculite of 2:1 (v:v) was used as the control. Various seedling indices were measured to assess the quality of the substrates. Tomato seedlings grown in solid digestate: vermiculite: perlite: activated carbon of 16:1:2:1 (m:m) displayed the best quality compared with all the other treatments, due to a correct balance between the digestate nutrient supply and the physical properties provided by vermiculite, perlite and activated carbon. Solid digestate could be a potential alternative for plug seedlings.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 726-731)

Pages:

3001-3006

Citation:

Online since:

August 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Ghehsareh, A.M., Borji, H., and Jafarpour, M., 2011. Effect of some culture substrates (date-palm peat, cocopeat and perlite) on some growing indices and nutrient elements uptake in greenhouse tomato. African Journal of Microbiology Research, 5(12): 1437-1442.

DOI: 10.5897/ajmr10.786

Google Scholar

[2] Raviv, M. and Lieth, J., 2008. Significance of soilless culture in agriculture. Soilless culture: theory and practice. Elsevier, Amsterdam: 1-11.

DOI: 10.1016/b978-044452975-6.50003-4

Google Scholar

[3] Grillas, S., Lucas, M., Bardopolou, E., et al., 2001. Perlite based soilless culture systems: Current commercial applications and prospects. Acta Horticulturae: 105-114.

DOI: 10.17660/actahortic.2001.548.10

Google Scholar

[4] Abad, M., Noguera, P., and Burés, S., 2001. National inventory of organic wastes for use as growing media for ornamental potted plant production: case study in Spain. Bioresource Technology, 77(2): 197-200.

DOI: 10.1016/s0960-8524(00)00152-8

Google Scholar

[5] Ribeiro, H., Romero, A., Pereira, H., et al., 2007. Evaluation of a compost obtained from forestry wastes and solid phase of pig slurry as a substrate for seedlings production. Bioresource Technology, 98(17): 3294-3297.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2006.07.002

Google Scholar

[6] Carmona, E., Moreno, M., Avilés, M., et al., 2012. Use of grape marc compost as substrate for vegetable seedlings. Scientia Horticulturae, 137: 69-74.

DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2012.01.023

Google Scholar

[7] Herrera, F., Castillo, J., Chica, A., et al., 2008. Use of municipal solid waste compost (MSWC) as a growing medium in the nursery production of tomato plants. Bioresource Technology, 99(2): 287-296.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2006.12.042

Google Scholar

[8] Vavrina, C., Ozores-Hampton, M., Armbrester, K., et al., 1996. Spent mushroom compost and biological amendments as an alternative to soilless media. Southwest Florida Research and Education Center.

Google Scholar

[9] Roe, N.E., Stoffella, P.J., and Graetz, D., 1997. Composts from various municipal solid waste feedstocks affect vegetable crops. I. Emergence and seedling growth. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 122(3): 427-432.

DOI: 10.21273/jashs.122.3.427

Google Scholar

[10] Möller, K. and Stinner, W., 2009. Effects of different manuring systems with and without biogas digestion on soil mineral nitrogen content and on gaseous nitrogen losses (ammonia, nitrous oxides). European Journal of Agronomy, 30(1): 1-16.

DOI: 10.1016/j.eja.2008.06.003

Google Scholar

[11] Stinner, W., Möller, K., and Leithold, G., 2008. Effects of biogas digestion of clover/grass-leys, cover crops and crop residues on nitrogen cycle and crop yield in organic stockless farming systems. European Journal of Agronomy, 29(2): 125-134.

DOI: 10.1016/j.eja.2008.04.006

Google Scholar

[12] Alburquerque, J., de la Fuente, C., Campoy, M., et al., 2012. Agricultural use of digestate for horticultural crop production and improvement of soil properties. European Journal of Agronomy, 43: 119-128.

DOI: 10.1016/j.eja.2012.06.001

Google Scholar

[13] Alburquerque, J.A., de la Fuente, C., Ferrer-Costa, A., et al., 2012. Assessment of the fertiliser potential of digestates from farm and agroindustrial residues. Biomass and Bioenergy, 40: 181-189.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.02.018

Google Scholar

[14] Abubaker, J., Risberg, K., and Pell, M., 2012. Biogas residues as fertilisers–Effects on wheat growth and soil microbial activities. Applied Energy.

DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.04.050

Google Scholar

[15] Feng, H., Qu, G., Ning, P., et al., 2011. The Resource Utilization of Anaerobic Fermentation Residue. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 11: 1092-1099.

DOI: 10.1016/j.proenv.2011.12.165

Google Scholar

[16] Goberna, M., Podmirseg, S., Waldhuber, S., et al., 2011. Pathogenic bacteria and mineral N in soils following the land spreading of biogas digestates and fresh manure. Applied Soil Ecology, 49: 18-25.

DOI: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2011.07.007

Google Scholar

[17] Spomer, L.A., 1990. Evaluating "drainage" in container and other shallow‐drained horticultural soils 1. Communications in Soil Science & Plant Analysis, 21(3-4): 221-235.

DOI: 10.1080/00103629009368227

Google Scholar

[18] Dickson, A., Leaf, A.L., and Hosner, J.F., 1960. Quality appraisal of white spruce and white pine seedling stock in nurseries. The Forestry Chronicle, 36(1): 10-13.

DOI: 10.5558/tfc36010-1

Google Scholar

[19] Matsunaka, T., Sawamoto, T., Ishimura, H., et al., 2006. Efficient use of digested cattle slurry from biogas plant with respect to nitrogen recycling in grassland. International Congress Series, 1293: 242-252.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ics.2006.03.016

Google Scholar