Oxygen Enrichment through Mini-Scale Rotary Six-Bed Pressure Swing Adsorption

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper presents the structure for a rotary six-bed adsorber that carries out a six-step PSA continuous oxygen generation process with a short cycle time and a low operation pressure ratio. The working principle of a rotary six-bed PSA oxygen generator is introduced and the effects of various operating parameters on PSA performance are experimentally investigated. The results indicate that, the adsorption pressure increases with the reduction of rotating speed and decreases with the lowering of the feed flow rate; with the acceleration of rotating velocity, the oxygen purity of the gas produced first rises and then drops, and it has an optimum rotating velocity; the higher the feed flow rate, the lower the oxygen purity of the product; the ratio of the pressurization angle to the adsorption angle has a remarkable effect on the oxygen purity with the oxygen purity increasing according to the condition of keeping the angle of the feeding ring groove and with the increase in this ratio; and the long-purging time at a low purging-gas flow rate is appropriate for miniature apparatus.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 726-731)

Pages:

780-788

Citation:

Online since:

August 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] R.T. Yang: Gas separation by adsorption processes. (Imperial College Press, London 1987).

Google Scholar

[2] D.M. Ruthven, S. Farooq and K.S. Knaebel: Pressure swing adsorption. (VCH Publishers, New York 1994).

DOI: 10.1002/aic.690410122

Google Scholar

[3] L.B. Bu and Y.S. Liu: Low Temperature and Specialty Gases, Vol. 24 (2006), p.11, In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[4] W.D. Marsh, R.C. Hoke, F.S. Pramuk and et al, U.S. Patent 3,142,547. (1964)

Google Scholar

[5] N.H. Berlin, U.S. Patent 3,280,536. (1966)

Google Scholar

[6] J. L. Wagner, U.S. Patent 3,797,201. (1974)

Google Scholar

[7] J.G. Jee, J.S. Lee and C.H. Lee: Industrial Engineering and Chemical Research, Vol. 40 (2001), p.3647

Google Scholar

[8] J.G. Jee, J.S. Lee, M.B. Kim and C.H. Lee: A. I. Ch. E. Journal, Vol. 51(2005), p.2988

Google Scholar

[9] M. Mofarahi, J. Towfighi and L. Fathi: Industrial Engineering and Chemical Research, Vol. 48(2009), p.5439

Google Scholar

[10] H. Eggert and et al, U.S. Patent 3,738,087-A. (1973)

Google Scholar

[11] J.J. Collins, U.S. Patent 3,973,931-A. (1976)

Google Scholar

[12] G.E. Keller and R.L. Jones: Abstracts Papers of the American Chemical Society, Vol. 180(1980), p.28

Google Scholar

[13] D.J. Connor, D.G. Doman, L. Jeziorowski and et al, U.S. Patent 6,406,523- B1. (2002)

Google Scholar

[14] K.L. Zhao, M.S. Shi, D.R. Chen and et al, China Patent CN200720095660.8. (2007)

Google Scholar

[15] L.Q. Ding, C.Z. Jin, Z. Xu, L.S Li and P.C. Shu, China Patent ZL 2007 1 0018454.1. (2007)

Google Scholar