Genes Expression of Key Enzymes in Phenylpropanes Metabolism Pathway in Cucumber with RT-PCR

Article Preview

Abstract:

Phenylpropanoid metabolism is an important secondary metabolism pathway in plants. Lignin, as a secondary metabolite was produced by secondary metabolism pathway, plays important roles on disease resistance in plants. PAL, C4H, and CHS are key enzymes involved in the secondary metabolism pathway and critical on disease resistance. We hypothesize that the expression of key enzymes of secondary metabolism pathway will be affected by abnormal environmental conditions; therefore provide the resistance to severe environment for plant. In this study, we analysed the gene expressions of PAL, C4H, and CHS under higher temperature and infection of germ (Pseudoperonosporacubensis) in Cucumber JingChun No.4, which is highly resistant to downy mildew. The gene expressions were quantified by semi-quantitative RT-PCR. Our results showed that the expression of C4H was consistently higher and not affected by germ inoculation. However, the expressions of PAL and CHS were increased at 2 h and 25 h, respectively, after inoculating with germs. Interestingly, we found that the expressions of all these three genes were decreased with treatment of higher temperature. Our results demonstrated that PAL, C4H and CSH are important in secondary metabolism and affect the potential resistant ability of plant to various severe growing environments.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

53-57

Citation:

Online since:

August 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] X. Duan, H. Mu, C. Liang and X. Yang: Journal of Northeast Forestry University Vol. 38 (2010), pp.109-110.

Google Scholar

[2] Y. Xu, H. Meng, P. Chen and Y. Li: Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica Vol. 32 (2012), pp.0975-0979.

Google Scholar

[3] G. Ouyang, and Y. Xue: Plant Physiology Communications, 3 (1988), pp.9-16.

Google Scholar

[4] R. A. Dixon, C. J. Lamb and S. Masoud: Gene, Vol. 179 (1996), pp.61-71.

Google Scholar

[5] M. J. Macdonald, G. B. D'cunha: Biochem. Cell Biol., Vol. 85 (2007), pp.273-282.

Google Scholar

[6] C. Capple: Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol., Vol. 49 (1998), pp.311-343.

Google Scholar

[7] M. Mizutani, D. Ohta, R. Sato: Plant Physiol., Vol. 113 (1997), pp.755-63.

Google Scholar

[8] C. R. Matin: Int. Rev. Cytol., Vol. 147 (1993), pp.233-84.

Google Scholar

[9] L. D. Chiaradia, P. G. Martins, I. Jantan: J. Med. Chem., Vol. 55 (2011), pp.390-402.

Google Scholar

[10] B. Li, R. Peng, X. Peng, F. Wang: Acta Ecologica Sinica, Vol. 21 (2001), pp.1796-1801.

Google Scholar

[11] Y. Shi, B. Li, X. Liu: Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, Vol. 18 (2007), pp.389-394.

Google Scholar

[12] A. Leyva, A. Jose, S. Julio: Plant Physiology, Vol. 108 (1995), pp.39-46.

Google Scholar

[13] G. Buffer, F. Bangerth: Plant Science Letters, Vol. 25 (1982), pp.227-237.

Google Scholar

[14] M. Baueher, B. Monties, M. V. Montagu: Crit. Rev. Plant Sci., Vol. 17 (1998), pp.125-197.

Google Scholar

[15] K. Blee, J. W. Choi, A. P. Oconnell: Phytochemistry, Vol. 57 (2001), pp.1159-1166.

Google Scholar

[16] V. J. H. Sewalt, W. Ni, J. W. Blount: Plant Physiol., Vol. 115 (1997), pp.41-50.

Google Scholar

[17] R. L. Feinbaum, F. M. Ausubel: Mol. Cell Biol., Vol. 8 (1988), p.1985-(1992).

Google Scholar