Application of Quantitative Ultrasound in Determination Bone Mineral Density Situation of Children and Adolescents

Article Preview

Abstract:

Objectives: Use quantitative ultrasound technology to determine the bone density of children and adolescents, understand the status and variation of ultrasonic bone density in children and adolescents.Methods: By stratified random cluster sampling, selected 3629 studenes in five schools in Tangshan and measured height and weight,and determined the right foot heel bone density using ultrasonic bone density analyzer.Results: It showed that the average of ultrasonic bone mineral density were 1535.4±20.6(m/s), decreased at the age of 6 to 9 years old and then increased with the age growth; at the age of 9 was the lowest, the SOS value of ultrasonic bone mineral density rebounded slightly from 10 to 13-year-old, after 13-year-old the SOS value increased with the age growth, the highest was at the age of 19. Ultrasonic bone density was associated with height,weight and body mass index.Conclusions: The development of the bone is a dynamic continuous evolutionary process, bone mineral density presented different rules for the different of age, gender, physical development status.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

192-197

Citation:

Online since:

August 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Pearson D, Masud T, Sahota O, Earnshaw S, Hosking D: J Clin Densitom Vol. 6 (2003), pp.345-352.

Google Scholar

[2] Group of China obesity task force: Chin J Epidemiol Vol. 25 (2004), pp.97-102.

Google Scholar

[3] Sievanen H, Cheng S, Olikanien S, Uusi-Rasi K: Osteoporos Int Vol. 12 (2001), pp.399-405.

Google Scholar

[4] Pinheiro MM, Castro CH, Frisoli A Jr, Szejnfeld VL: Calcif Tissue Int Vol. 73 (2003), pp.555-564.

DOI: 10.1007/s00223-002-1096-4

Google Scholar

[5] Gluer CC, Eastell R, Reid DM: J Bone Miner Res Vol. 19 (2004), pp.782-793.

Google Scholar

[6] Rothenberg RJ, Boyd JL, Holcomb JP: J Clin Densitom Vol. 7 (2004), pp.101-10.

Google Scholar

[7] Trebacz H, Natali A: Osteoporos Int Vol. 9 (1999), pp.99-105.

Google Scholar

[8] Yaqin Zhang, Hui Li, Xiujuan Wu: Journal of Applied Clinical Pediatrics Vol. 22 (2007), pp.534-535.

Google Scholar

[9] Omar A, Turan S, Bereket A: Arch Osteoporos Vol. 1 (2006), pp.37-41.

Google Scholar

[10] Xu H, Chen JX, Gong J, Zhang TM, Wu QL, Yuan ZM, Wang JP: J Clin Densitometry Vol. 10 (2007), pp.266-275.

Google Scholar

[11] Jinping Wang, Hao Xu, Dan Wang: Chin J Med Imaging Technol Vol. 25 (2009), pp.1461-1463.

Google Scholar

[12] Shumin Cheng, Dafang Yu, Wenjuan Guo: Modern Preventive Medicine Vol. 34 (2007), pp.4690-4694.

Google Scholar

[13] Jiachang Liu, Qiaohong Ouyang, Jin Zhang, Qing Liu, Xiaomei Teng: Chinese Journal of Clinical Rehabilitation Vol. 6 (2002), pp.3226-3227.

Google Scholar

[14] Jibin Li, Haiqi Li, Songyuan Wang. Chinese Journal of Child Health Care Vol. 8 (2001), pp.230-232.

Google Scholar

[15] Chunyun Yang, Qingfang Qiu, Zhenjie Cong: Chin J Osteoporos Vol. 17 (2011), pp.47-50.

Google Scholar

[16] Emilie Rocher, Chappard, Christine, Jaffre: Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism Vol. 26 (2008), pp.73-78.

Google Scholar