Methods for Determining Differences of Attribute Weight between Evidences in Bridge Assessment

Xiao Feng Li; Shu Chun  Ding; Xue Mei  Wang

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.760-762.2172

Paper Titles

An Approach of Advanced Optimistic Protocol Based on Time Dams
p.2151

Three Conjectures about the Number Systems and their Conversion
p.2156

An Adaptive Level Damped Algorithm Based on PINS for Ship
p.2162

An Evaluation Model to Human Factors in Information Systems Based on Consistent Quantification of Index and Evaluation Equilibrating
p.2167

Methods for Determining Differences of Attribute Weight between Evidences in Bridge Assessment
p.2172

A Novel Performance Metric of Routing Algorithm
p.2177

Analysis on Local Congestion of Network-on-Chip
p.2183

Numerical Simulation of the Protection System of Explosive Reaction Armor
p.2188

Self-Adaptive Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm with Mutation Operation Based on K-Means
p.2194

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vols. 760-762Methods for Determining Differences of Attribute...

Methods for Determining Differences of Attribute Weight between Evidences in Bridge Assessment

Abstract:

The attribute weights determined is a key issue in the decision-making. Attribute weights given in the form of distribution of the attribute value to language assessment and rating their trust completely unknown or partially unknown circumstances, the proposed method of weight determination of the two based on objective evidence of differences between rights. Method one calculated based on the evidence of conflict between the coefficient weights; method to calculate the mean and variance of the research evidence weights. Finally, through the application of specific cases to verify the effectiveness of the method.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 760-762)

Pages:

2172-2176

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.760-762.2172

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

September 2013

Authors:

Xiao Feng Li, Shu Chun Ding, Xue Mei Wang

Keywords:

Language Assessment, Making Conflicting Evidence, Multi-Attribute Decision, Variance

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] Ying-Ming Wang, Ying Luo. Integration of correlations with standard deviations for determing attribute weights in multiple attribute decision making . Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 2010, p.1–12.

DOI: 10.1016/j.mcm.2009.07.016

Google Scholar

[2] Thomas L. Saaty, Rank from comparisons and from ratings in the analytic hierarchy/network processes. European Journal of Operational Research , 2006, p.557–570.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2004.04.032

Google Scholar

[3] X. Xu, A note on the subjective and objective integrated approach to determine attribute weights, European Journal of Operational Research , 2004, p.530–532.

DOI: 10.1016/s0377-2217(03)00146-2

Google Scholar

[4] G.W. Wei, Maximizing deviation method for multiple attribute decision making in intuitionistic fuzzy setting, Knowledge-Based Systems , 2008, p.833–836.

DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2008.03.038

Google Scholar

[5] Z. Wu, Y. Chen, The maximizing deviation method for group multiple attribute decision making under linguistic environment, Fuzzy Sets and Systems , 2007, p.1608–1617.

DOI: 10.1016/j.fss.2007.01.013

Google Scholar