Use of Hydroxyl Radical Yield to Investigate a Urea and Cobalt Modified TiO2 Photocatalyst Degrading Rhodamine B under UV and Visible Light

Article Preview

Abstract:

Material modification of TiO2 photo-catalyst (NMTi) by doping urea and cobalt via sol-gel method was used to achieve high efficiency degradation of rhodamine B (RhB) under visible light (Vis). Although good removal (up to 42% of TOC removed) of RhB by Degussa P25 under ultra violet irradiation, P25 did not effectively degrade RhB (up to 14% TOC removed) under Vis. In the batch photo-catalytic experiment with Vis irradiation, the removal efficiencies of absorbance and TOC by NMTi were 28 and 30%. We used terephthalic acid as fluorescence probe to catch hydroxyl radical (OH) and calculated their quantum yields. The OH yields of NMTi with Vis irradiating was 8.91×10-6 while P25 of 2.65×10-6 (P25 of 1.44×10-5 and NMTi of 1.00×10-5 under UV). The OH yields of NMTi were higher than that of P25 under Vis, but otherwise under UV irradiation. Therefore, our new composited NMTi was more effective than P25 under Vis for both absorbance and TOC removal of RhB. It seemed possessed the application potential under Vis irradiation.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

595-600

Citation:

Online since:

September 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] R.J. Wu, C.C. Chen, M.H. Chen and C.S. Lu: Journal of Hazardous Materials Vol. 162 (2009), pp.945-953.

Google Scholar

[2] Y.T. Kwon, K.Y. Song, W.I. Lee, G.J. Choi and Y.R. Do: Journal of Catalysis Vol. 191 (2000), pp.192-199.

Google Scholar

[3] D. Chen and A.K. Ray: Water Research Vol. 32 (1998), pp.3223-3234.

Google Scholar

[4] N. San, A. Hatipoğlu, G. Koçtürk, and Z. Çınar: Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry Vol. 146 (2002), pp.189-197.

DOI: 10.1016/s1010-6030(01)00620-7

Google Scholar

[5] T. Bak, J. Nowotny, M. Rekas and C.C. Sorrell: International Journal of Hydrogen Energy Vol. 27 (2002), pp.991-1022.

DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3199(02)00022-8

Google Scholar

[6] W.C. Hung, S.H. Fu, J.J. Tseng, H. Chu and T.H. Ko: Chemosphere Vol. 66 (2007), pp.2142-2151.

Google Scholar

[7] P. Bouras, E. Stathatos and P. Lianos: Applied Catalysis B: Environmental Vol. 73 (2007), pp.51-59.

Google Scholar

[8] S. Rehman, R. Ullah, A.M. Butt and N.D. Gohar: Journal of Hazardous Materials Vol. 170 (2009), pp.560-569.

Google Scholar

[9] D.S. Kima and Y.S. Park: Journal of Chemical Engineering Vol. 116 (2006), pp.133-137.

Google Scholar

[10] J. Zhao, T. Wu, K. Wu, K. Oikawa, H. Hidaka and N. Serpone: Environmental Science & Technology Vol. 32 (1998), pp.2394-2400.

Google Scholar

[11] K.I. Ishibashi, A. Fujishima, T. Watanabe and K. Hashimoto: Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry Vol. 134 (2000), pp.139-142.

Google Scholar

[12] K.I. Ishibashi, A. Fujishima, T. Watanabe and K. Hashimoto: Electrochemistry Communications Vol. 2 (2000), pp.207-210.

Google Scholar

[13] P. Bansal, D. Singh and D. Sud: Separation and Purification Technology Vol. 72 (2010), pp.357-365.

Google Scholar

[14] M. Saquib and M. Muneer: Dyes Pigments Vol. 56 (2003), pp.37-49.

Google Scholar

[15] Y. Ku and I.L. Jung: Water Research Vol. 1 (2001), pp.135-142.

Google Scholar

[16] R.J. Wu, C.C. Chen, M.H. Chen and C.S. Lu: Journal of Hazardous Materials Vol. 162 (2009), pp.945-953.

Google Scholar