Numerical Simulation on Two Phase Combustion Characteristic in Solid Rocket Ramjet Afterburning Chamber

Article Preview

Abstract:

Numerical simulation on two-phase combustion characteristic in afterburning chamber of solid rocket ramjet was carried out by applying particle trajectory model. It was analyzed that the nozzle number of secondary combustion chamber, inlet angle of air and particles diameter impact on efficiency of combustion. Results show that the combustion efficiency in the afterburning chamber is highest, achieving 99.6% when the angle between both air inlets is 180°, particle diameter is 15μm, and 5-hole nozzle is used. By contrary, when the angle between both air inlets is 90°, particle diameter is 5μm, and 5-hole nozzle is used, the afterburning chamber has a lowest combustion efficiency of 70.3%.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 774-776)

Pages:

737-742

Citation:

Online since:

September 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Vanka, S P, Craig R R and Stull F D. Mixing, Chemical Reaction and Flow Field Development in Ducted Rockets[R]. AIAA-85-1271.

DOI: 10.2514/6.1985-1271

Google Scholar

[2] Dijkstra F N, et al. Ducted rocket combustion experiments atlow gas generator combustion temperatures. AIAA 95-2415.

Google Scholar

[3] A.E.H.J. Mayer, R. A. Stowe. Experimental study into mixing in a solid fuel ducted rocket combustion chamber. AIAA 2000-3346.

DOI: 10.2514/6.2000-3346

Google Scholar

[4] R.A. Stowe, A. De Champlain, A.E.H.J. Mayer. Modelling Combustor Performance of a Ducted Rocket. AIAA. 2000: 3728.

DOI: 10.2514/6.2000-3728

Google Scholar

[5] R. A: Stowe, A. De Champlain, A.E.H.J. Mayer. Modelling and Flow Visualization of Mixing in a ducted Rocket Combustor. AIAA. 1998: 3768.

DOI: 10.2514/6.1998-3768

Google Scholar

[6] Patankar, S. V. and Spalding, D. B. ,A Calculation Procedure for Heat,Mass and Momentum Transfer in Three-Dimensional Parabolic Flows, International Journal of Heat Mass Transfer,1972, Vol. 15, pp.1787-1106.

DOI: 10.1016/0017-9310(72)90054-3

Google Scholar

[7] Kuo, K. K. ,Settles, G. S. ,and Yang, V. ,Solid-Propellant Ducted Rocket (SDR) Study,Annual Report to CSIST, PSU-ME-R-86/87-0003,August (1986).

Google Scholar

[8] Hu Jianxin, and Xia Zhixun et al, Experimental Investigationon Secondary Combustion in Unchoked Ducted Rocket [J]. Journal of Aerospace Power. 2004, 19(5): 713-716.

Google Scholar

[9] Hu Jianxin, and Xia Zhixun et al, Two phase flow combustion modeling of secondary combustion chamber in a Unchoked ducted rocket [J], Journal of Propulsion Technology, Oct 2005 Vol. 26, NO. 5. pp.28-31.

Google Scholar

[10] Liu Peijin, Lv Xiang, He Guoqiang and Tian Weiping, Influence of Injection Nozzle Configuration on Configuration Matching of Unchoked Ducted Rocket[J], Journal of Propulsion Technology, Jun 2004 Vol. 25, NO. 3. pp.398-400, 403.

Google Scholar

[11] Zhou Jishi , Li Jinxian, Zhong Hua and Feng Xiping. Effects of the Angles of Binary Air-inlet on Afterburning of Ducted Rocket Motors[J]. Journal of Solid Rocket Technology, 2005 Vol. 28, NO. 2. pp.112-115.

Google Scholar

[12] Li Gang, He Guoqiang, Sun Zhenhua, Cao Junwei and Wang Hugan, Experimental Investigation on Secondary Combustion in Solid Rocket Ramjet[J], Journal of Solid Rocket Technology, 2007 Vol. 30, NO. 5. pp.400-403.

Google Scholar