Simulation of Biomass-to-SNG Process via Pressurized Interconnected Fluidized Beds

Article Preview

Abstract:

Biomass-to-SNG technology is one of the most important applications of biomass energy. The simulating model of the SNG production via interconnected fluidized beds was established and the biomass-to-SNG process was simulated. The effects of the operating conditions of the gasifier, like the gasification pressure, gasification temperature and the steam to biomass ratio (S/B), on the composition of crude methane gas were studied. The simulating results showed that there was an optimum gasification temperature and pressure for the highest methane content in the crude methane gas, while S/B had adverse effects on it. To achieve higher methane content, the suitable gasification temperature is about 750 °C, S/B is about 0.4, and the gasification pressure may be not too high.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 781-784)

Pages:

2425-2428

Citation:

Online since:

September 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] L.H. Zhang, C.B. Xu and P. Champagne: Energy Conversion and Management, Vol. 51 (2010) No. 5, p.969.

Google Scholar

[2] A.F. Kirkels, G.P.J. Verbong: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 15 (2011) No. 1, p.471.

Google Scholar

[3] S. Hwang, R. Smith: Chemical Engineering Communications, Vol. 196 (2008) No. 5, p.616.

Google Scholar

[4] R.A. Dagle, Y. Wang, G.G. Xia, J.J. Strohm, J. Holladay and D.R. Palo: Applied Catalysis A: General, Vol. 326 (2007) No. 2, p.213.

DOI: 10.1016/j.apcata.2007.04.015

Google Scholar

[5] A. Duret, C. Friedli, F. Maréçchal: Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 13 (2005) No. 15, p.1434.

Google Scholar

[6] S. Heyne, M.C. Seemann, S. Harvey: Chemical Engineering Transactions, Vol. 21 (2010), p.409.

Google Scholar

[7] M. Juraščík, A. Sues, K.J. Ptasinski: Energy, Vol. 35 (2010) No. 2, p.880.

Google Scholar

[8] H.X. Wu, Z.L. Zhao, X.B. Wang, A.Q. Zheng, H.B. Li, F. He: Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, Vol. 32 (2013) No. 1, p.83 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[9] E. Wikström, P. Andersson, S. Marklund: Review of Scientific Instruments, Vol. 69 (1998) No. 4, p.1850.

Google Scholar

[10] A. Bischi, ø. Langørgenb, I. Saanum, I. Saanum, J. Bakken, M. Seljeskog, M. Bysveen, J.X. Morin and O. Bolland: International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, Vol. 5 (2011) No. 3, p.467.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2010.09.005

Google Scholar

[11] A. Kumar, D.D. Jones and M.A. Hanna: Energies, Vol. 2 (2009) No. 3, p.556.

Google Scholar

[12] Hugo de Lasa, Enrique Salaices, Jahirul Mazumder and R. Lucky: Chemical Reviews, Vol. 111(2011) No. 9, p.5404.

Google Scholar

[13] F. Feng, G.H. Song, L.H. Shen and J Xiao: Current Biotechnology, Vol. 2 (2012), p.428 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[14] F. Feng, G.H. Song, L.H. Shen, J. Xiao, L. Wei and H.J. Meng: Modern Chemical Industry, Vol. 32 (2012) No. 12, p.100 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[15] F. Feng, G.H. Song, L.H. Shen and J Xiao: Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, Vol. 44 (2013) No. 3, p.129(in Chinese).

Google Scholar