Sensitive Layer Thickness Dependence on Microcantilever Sensor Sensitivity

Article Preview

Abstract:

A sensitive layer is a main component in detecting an analyte target in a microcantilever-based biosensor. The sensitive layer coated on the microcantilever surface can induce a surface stress change as consequence of adsorbate-surface interaction. Therefore, a presence of stress is necessary to be investigated because it determines a deflection which influences the sensor sensitivity. In this work, we study a dependence of the film stress and microcantilever deflection on the gold or 3-Aminopropyltriethoxysilane (aminosilane) layers thickness in static mode operation. It is found that the optimum thickness of the sensitive layer for both aminosilane and gold can be obtained by analyzing the maximum film stress and the maximum microcantilever deflection. We also investigated the effect of Youngs moduli on the maximum stress and the maximum deflection. It is obtained that the Youngs moduli is a function that determines the peaks on the maximum stress and the maximum deflection. Our results indicate that the material properties and the thickness of sensitive layer should be considered to obtain a high sensitivity of microcantilever biosensor.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

219-224

Citation:

Online since:

September 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] R. Raiteri, M. Grattarola, H. Butt, P. Skladal, Micromechanical cantilever-based biosensor, Sens. Actuators B 79 (2001) 115-126.

DOI: 10.1016/s0925-4005(01)00856-5

Google Scholar

[2] S.K. Vashist, A review of Microcantilevers for Sensing Applications, J. Nanotechnol. 3 (2007) 1-15.

Google Scholar

[3] A. Boisen, J. Thaysen, H. Jensenius, O. Hansen, Environmental sensors based on micromachined cantilevers with integrated read-out, J. Ultramic. 82 (2000) 11-16.

DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3991(99)00148-5

Google Scholar

[4] R. Nuryadi, A. Djajadi, R. Adiel, L. Aprilia, N. Aisah, Resonance frequency change in microcantilever-based sensor due to humidity variation, Mater. Sci. Forum 737 (2013) 176-187.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.737.176

Google Scholar

[5] R. Nuryadi, W. Rianti, L. Aprilia, The Effect of variuos immobilization layer materials to microcantilever sensor sensitivity, Proceeding of International Conference on Physics 2012, Yogyakarta, 18-19 September (2012).

Google Scholar

[6] A. H. Schmid, S.E. Stanca, M.S. Thakur, K. R. Thampia, and C. R. Suri, Site-directed antibody immobilization on gold substrate for surface plasmon resonance sensors, Sens. Actuators B 113 (2006) 297–303.

DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2005.03.018

Google Scholar

[7] D. Maraldo, and R. Mutharasan, Optimization of antibody immobilization for sensing using piezoelectrically excited-millimeter-sized cantilever (PEMC) sensors, Sens. Actuators B 123 (2007) 474–479.

DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2006.09.034

Google Scholar

[8] G. H. Olsen and M. Ettenberg, Calculated stresses in multilayered heteroepitaxial structures, Appl. Phys. Lett. 48(6) (1977) 2543 – 2547.

DOI: 10.1063/1.323970

Google Scholar

[9] G. Yoshikawa, Mechanical analysis and optimization of a microcantilever sensor coated with a solid receptor film, Appl. Phys. Lett. 98 (2011) 173502-1_173502-3.

DOI: 10.1063/1.3583451

Google Scholar