New Technique for Conceptual Selection of Manufacturing Process and Material, Case Study: Metal Matrix Composite Component

Article Preview

Abstract:

This article introduces a new technique involving concurrent engineering (CE) strategy and analytical network process (ANP) technique to form a ranking methodology as a part of the conceptual design selection (CS). The proposed method is referred as concurrent network (CN). The objective of this study is to simultaneously consider of all features of product elements by implementing CE strategy. Furthermore, CN enables interdependence and interrelationship analysis between product elements by application of ANP. In this study, CN is utilized for a conceptual design of metal matrix composite (MMC) component. The results show that by using CN, all important product parameters can be considered simultaneously during the CDS and the importance weights of manufacturing process parameters and material parameters which are related to MMC component performance are attained.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

82-86

Citation:

Online since:

September 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] M.C. Xiong: J. Mater. Process. Technol. Vol. 139 (2003), pp.453-456.

Google Scholar

[2] A.H.B. Duffy, M.M. Andreason, K.J. MacCallum: J. Eng. Des. Vol. 4 (1993), p.251–261.

Google Scholar

[3] M. Sapuan: Assembly Autom. Vol. 25 (2005), pp.146-152.

Google Scholar

[4] Z. Ayağ: Int. J. Prod. Econ. Res. Vol. 4 (2005), pp.687-713.

Google Scholar

[5] H. Yang, D. Xue and Y.L. Tu: Concurrent Eng. Vol. 14 (2006), pp.43-53.

Google Scholar

[6] C.H. Fine, B. Golany and H. Naseraldin: J. Oper. Manage. Vol. 23 (2005), pp.389-403.

Google Scholar

[7] Y.H. Hung, C.T. Seng and H. T Gwo: Decis, Support Syst, Vol. 51 (2011), pp.270-291.

Google Scholar

[8] L. Meade and A. Presley: IEEE T. Eng. Manage. Vol. 49 (2002), p.22–28.

Google Scholar

[9] E.E. Karsak, S. Sozer and S.E. Alptekin: COMPUT IND ENG Vol. 44 (2003), pp.171-19.

Google Scholar

[10] G. Buyukozkan, T. Ertay, C. Kahraman and D. Ruan: Int. J. Intell. Syst. Vol. 19 (2004), pp.443-461.

Google Scholar

[11] G.B. Olson: J COMPUT-AIDED MATER Vol. 4 (1997), pp.43-56.

Google Scholar

[12] G. Brunettia and B. Golobb: COMPUT AIDED DES. Vol. 32 (2000), p.77–887.

Google Scholar

[13] S.V. Prasad and R. Asthana: TRIBOL LETT Vol. 17 (2004), pp.445-453.

Google Scholar

[14] H. Nakanishi and K. Kakihara: JSAE Rev. Vol. 23 (2002), pp.365-370.

Google Scholar

[15] P.J. Blau and M.H. Meyer III: Wear Vol. 255 (2003), pp.1261-1269.

Google Scholar

[16] N. Chawla and K.K. Chawla in: Metal Matrix Composites, Springer, New York (2006).

Google Scholar

[17] D.B. Miracle: Compos. Sci. Technol. Vol. 65 (2005), pp.2526-2540.

Google Scholar

[18] T.L. Saaty in: Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process, RWS Publication, Pittsburgh (1996).

Google Scholar