Effect of Electrode Shape on Power and Internal Resistance in Benthic Microbial Fuel Cell Material on Marine Sediment

Article Preview

Abstract:

As the electrode structure has a great effect on the performance of the benthic microbial fuel cell (BMFC), several graphite electrodes with different shapes (column, plane disk and tubular shape for example) are designed in this paper. The maximum power density (Pm) of BMFC-c and BMFC-d are 20.2 mW•m-2 and 14.9 mW•m-2 respectively, and the internal resistances are 333 Ω and 598 Ω respectively. Three cells are composed of three different sizes of graphite tubes, and their internal diameter of these electrodes are 2.5 cm (called it as BMFC-I for short); 1.0 cm (BMFC-II) and 0 cm (column shape for comparison, BMFC-III) respectively. Test results show that the Pm of BMFC-I, BMFC-II and BMFC-III are 13, 11 and 16 mW•m-2 respectively, and their internal resistances are 435 Ω, 488 Ω and 419 Ω respectively. Results show that the column structure electrode has a lower internal resistance and a higher power density than the disk and tubular structure electrode.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 79-82)

Pages:

2195-2198

Citation:

Online since:

August 2009

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2009 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] C.E. Reimers; L.M. Tender, W. Wang. Environ. Sci. Technol vol. 35 (2001), p.192.

Google Scholar

[2] L.M. Tender, C. E. Reimers, Lovley. et al vol. 20 (2002), p.821.

Google Scholar

[3] D.R. Bond, E. Dawn, Holmes, L.M. Tender, D.R. Lovely vol. 295 (2002), p.483.

Google Scholar

[4] Liu H, B.E. Logan. Environ. Sci. Technol vol. 38 (2004), p.2281.

Google Scholar

[5] B.E. Logan. Sci. Technol vol. 38 (2004), p.160.

Google Scholar

[6] D.R. Lovley, Curr. Opin. Biotechnol vol. 17 (2006), p.327.

Google Scholar

[7] D.A. Lowy, J.G. Zeikus, D.H. Park, D.R. Lovley, L.M. Tender, Biosens. Bioelectron vol. 21 (2006), p. (2058).

Google Scholar

[8] D.H. Park, J.G. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol vol. 59 (2002), p.58.

Google Scholar

[9] H. Liu, S.A. Cheng, B.E. Logan, Environ. Sci. Technol vol. 39 (2005), p.658.

Google Scholar

[10] S.A. Cheng, H. Liu, B.E. Logan, Environ. Sci. Technol vol. 40 (2006), p.364.

Google Scholar

[11] H. Liu, B. E. Logan. Environ. Sci. Technol vol. 38 (2004), p.4040.

Google Scholar

[12] S.A. Cheng, L. Hong, B. E. Logan. Environ. Sci. Technol vol. 40 (2006), p.2426.

Google Scholar

[13] A.K. Manohar, F. Mansfeld. Electrochimica Acta vol. 54 (2009), p.1664.

Google Scholar

[14] Z. He, S.D. Minteer, L.T. Angenent. Environ. Sci. Technol vol. 39 (2005), p.5262.

Google Scholar