Natural Organic Matter Removal by UV/ Chlorine Process: Modeling and Optimization

Article Preview

Abstract:

This study evaluated and optimized the UV/ chlorine process for natural organic matters (NOMs) removal using response surface methodology (RSM). The effects of both the primary and secondary interactions of the reaction variables, including initial chlorine concentration (X1), UV radiation time (X2) and pH value (X3), were examined. A satisfactory prediction response model (R2=0.999) was obtained, indicating the reliability of the methodology. The optimum condition obtained by CCD were 4.5 mg·L-1 initial chlorine concentration, 7 min UV radiation time and pH 6.7. Under the optical condition, the maximum TOC removal was 48% and TOC concentration was only 2.6 mg·L-1. The UV/ chlorine process as a novel AOP has many advantages for drinking water treatment, in terms of less chemical consumption, shorter reaction time and simpler technology.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 807-809)

Pages:

466-471

Citation:

Online since:

September 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Lin H C, Wang G S: Desalination. 270 (2011), pp.221-226.

Google Scholar

[2] Hussain S, Leeuwen J V, Chow C: Chemical Engineering Journal. Vol. 225 (2013), P. 394-405.

Google Scholar

[3] Shon H, Phuntsho S, Chaudhary D, et al: Drink. Water Eng. Sci. Vol. 6 (2013), P. 59-77.

Google Scholar

[4] Katsoyiannis I A, Canonica S: Water Research, Vol. 45 (2011), pp.3811-3822.

Google Scholar

[5] Khataee A: Environmental technology, Vol. 31 (2010), pp.73-86.

Google Scholar

[6] Nowell L H, Hoigné J: Water Research, Vol. 26 (1992), pp.599-605.

Google Scholar

[7] Hansen K, Zortea R, Piketty A: Science of the Total Environment, Vol. 443 (2013), pp.850-856.

Google Scholar

[8] Kim H, Shim J, Lee S: Chemosphere, Vol. 46 (2002), pp.123-130.

Google Scholar

[9] Wang D, Bolton J R, Hofmann R: Water Research, Vol. 46 (2012), pp.4677-4686.

Google Scholar

[10] Sichel C, Garcia C, Andre K: Water Research, Vol. 45 (2011), pp.6371-6380.

Google Scholar

[11] Watts M J, Rosenfeldt E J, Linden K G: Journal of water supply: research and technology. Vol. 56 (2007), pp.469-477.

Google Scholar

[12] Jin J, El-Din M G, Bolton J R: Water Research, Vol. 45 (2011), pp.1890-1896.

Google Scholar

[13] Kasiri M, Khataee A: Environmental technology, Vol. 33 (2012), pp.1417-1425.

Google Scholar

[14] Zhang J, Fu D, Xu Y: Journal of Environmental Sciences, Vol. 22 (2010), pp.1281-1289.

Google Scholar

[15] Yang Y, Li Y, Zhang Y: Separation and Purification Technology, Vol. 76 (2010), pp.72-78.

Google Scholar

[16] Sahoo C, Gupta A: Journal of Hazardous Materials, Vol. 215–216 (2012), pp.302-310.

Google Scholar

[17] Trinh T K, Kang L S: Chemical Engineering Research and Design, Vol. 89 (2011), pp.1126-1135.

Google Scholar

[18] Sarathy S R, Mohseni M: Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 41 (2007), pp.8315-8320.

Google Scholar

[19] Watts M J, Linden K G: Water Research, Vol. 41 (2007), pp.2871-2878.

Google Scholar

[20] Feng Y, Smith D W, Bolton J R: Journal of Environmental Engineering and Science, Vol. 6 (2007), pp.277-284.

Google Scholar