Relationship between Planes of Cu2O Microcrystal and Photo-Catalytic Degradation of Methylene Blue

Article Preview

Abstract:

Four kinds of Cu2O microcrystals with different morphologies are synthesized via low temperature hydrothermal synthetic method. The photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue (MB) of the above different Cu2O is preliminary explored based on this observation. 6-facet, 8-facet, 14-facet are prepared by PVP system and 26-facet is prepared by NaOH system. They are characterized by means of Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) and Diffuse Reflectance Spectra (DRS). Under 150 W xenon lamp irradiation, 0.5 gL1 catalyst and 0.1% (v/v) 30% H2O2 as co-catalyst are used to degrade 5% 100 mL MB solution. The reaction time is 80 min. 26-facet Cu2O polyhedral discolor about 89.48% of MB while 6-facet Cu2O microcrystal about discolor about 20.18% which is the lowest decolourization rate among all the samples. The photocatalytic performance of 8-facet Cu2O microcrystal is slight better than that of 14-facet. The decolourization rate of 8-facet and 14-facet are 56.00% and 41.08%, respectively. The main reason is that the planes of Cu2O microcrystal have a main influence on photocatalytic degradation of MB.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 807-809)

Pages:

562-566

Citation:

Online since:

September 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Q. P. Chen, J. H. Li, X. J. Li, K. Huang, B. X. Zhou, W. M. Cai, and W. F. Shangguan: Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 46, pp.11451-11458, Oct (2012).

Google Scholar

[2] A. Fujishima: nature, vol. 238, pp.37-38, (1972).

Google Scholar

[3] M. A. Rafea and N. Roushdy: Journal of Physics D-Applied Physics, vol. 42, Jan (2009).

Google Scholar

[4] C. H. Kuo, C. H. Chen, and M. H. Huang: Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 17, pp.3773-3780, Dec (2007).

Google Scholar

[5] A. M. Abdulkarem, A. A. Aref, A. Abdulhabeeb, Y. F. Li, and Y. Yu: Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 560, pp.132-141, May (2013).

Google Scholar

[6] Y. Zhang, B. Deng, T. R. Zhang, D. M. Gao, and A. W. Xu: Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 114, pp.5073-5079, Mar (2010).

Google Scholar

[7] H. G. Yang, G. Liu, S. Z. Qiao, C. H. Sun, Y. G. Jin, S. C. Smith, J. Zou, H. M. Cheng, and G. Q. Lu: Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 131, pp.4078-4083, Mar (2009).

Google Scholar

[8] Y. M. Sui, W. Y. Fu, H. B. Yang, Y. Zeng, Y. Y. Zhang, Q. Zhao, Y. E. Li, X. M. Zhou, Y. Leng, M. H. Li, and G. T. Zou: Crystal Growth & Design, vol. 10, pp.99-108, Jan (2010).

DOI: 10.1021/cg900437x

Google Scholar

[9] S. D. Sun, C. C. Kong, S. C. Yang, L. Q. Wang, X. P. Song, B. J. Ding, and Z. M. Yang: Crystengcomm, vol. 13, pp.2217-2221, (2011).

Google Scholar

[10] Y. J. Xiong and Y. N. Xia: Advanced Materials, vol. 19, pp.3385-3391, Oct (2007).

Google Scholar

[11] Q. Huang, F. Kang, H. Liu, Q. Li, and X. D. Xiao: Journal of Materials Chemistry A, vol. 1, pp.2418-2425, (2013).

Google Scholar