MCCB Instantaneous Calibration Current Error Decomposition and Control Method

Article Preview

Abstract:

The dissertation focuses on the limited calibration accuracy of breaker instantaneous problems,explains the reasons for calibration current error.It expounds the current amplitude error,as well as the decomposition method for non-periodic component error.Meanwhile,this dissertation proposes calibration current evaluation methods and successive approximation control methods.It demonstrates the feasibility of this method,by adopting theoretical analysis and simulation.It has been proved through practical application that the method is used to eliminate current error and enhance breaker instantaneous calibration accuracy.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 834-836)

Pages:

1263-1270

Citation:

Online since:

October 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Bogdan Kasztenny. Enhanced Numerical Breaker Failure Protection. IEEE TRANSACTION ON POWER DELIVERY, 2008, 23(4): 1838 - 1845.

DOI: 10.1109/tpwrd.2008.917931

Google Scholar

[2] Kitcharoenwat S, Konghirun M,  Sangswang A. A controlled current AC-AC converter for circuit breaker testing.  2012 15th International Conference on  Electrical Machines and Systems (ICEMS). 2012: 1- 6.

DOI: 10.1109/ecticon.2012.6254346

Google Scholar

[3] Junmin Zhang, Lei Tian, Chao Gao. Research on the influence of the DC component of short-circuit current on arc dynamic characteristics during the arcing period. 2011 1st International Conference on Electric Power Equipment-Switching Technology (ICEPE-ST). 2011: 647- 651.

DOI: 10.1109/icepe-st.2011.6122903

Google Scholar

[4] Das J C. Calculations of generator source short- circuit current according to ANSI/IEEE and IEC standards with EMTP verifications. Pulp and Paper Industry Technical Conference, 2009: 205-215.

DOI: 10.1109/papcon.2009.5185412

Google Scholar

[5] Abiyev A N. A new signal processing technique for evaluation of the reactive power in the power transmission and distribution systems. Southeastcon, 2008: 356 – 361.

DOI: 10.1109/secon.2008.4494319

Google Scholar

[6] Abiyev A N, Dimililer K. Reactive Power Measurement in Sinusoidal and Nonsinusoidal Conditions by Use of the Walsh Functions. Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference Proceedings, 2008: 89 – 94.

DOI: 10.1109/imtc.2008.4547010

Google Scholar

[7] Won S P, Golnaraghi F, Melek W. A Fastening Tool Tracking System Using an IMU and a Position Sensor With Kalman Filters and a Fuzzy Expert System. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics. 2009, 56 : 1782 – 1792.

DOI: 10.1109/tie.2008.2010166

Google Scholar

[8] Sharifian H, Abyaneh H A, Salman S K. Determination of the Minimum Break Point Set Using Expert System and Genetic Algorithm Power Delivery. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 2010, 25: 1284 -1295.

DOI: 10.1109/tpwrd.2010.2043999

Google Scholar

[9] Sun Mingxuan, Yan Qiuzhen. Error tracking of iterative learning control systems[J]. ACTA AUTOMATICA SINICA, 2012(38)11: 1-12. (In Chinese).

DOI: 10.3724/sp.j.1004.2013.00251

Google Scholar

[10] Li Jia, Jiping Shi, Mingsen Qiu. Aniterative learning control algorithm with convergence analysis for batch processes[J]. CIESC Journal, 2010(61)1: 116-122. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar