The Effect of Cannulated Screw Placement Angle in the Management of Femoral Neck Fracture

Article Preview

Abstract:

Fixation with cannulated screw was widely accepted for management of femoral neck fracture. However, the angle of placement cannulated screw for management of femoral neck fracture still controversial. The present study aims to investigate the mechanical behavior of the cannulated screws with two different angles of placements which are 135o and 150o in inverted triangular configuration for management of femoral neck fracture via finite element method. Therefore, the 3D model of a proximal femur consist of femoral neck fracture was constructed from CT data images using medical image processing software. The von Mises stress distributions on the cannulated screws were compared between each screw angle placement. The result showed that the cannulated screws in inverted triangle with 135o of placement angle have better stress distributions than 150o placement angle.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

216-220

Citation:

Online since:

December 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] J. -J. Yang, L. -C. Lin, K. -H. Chao, S. -Y. Chuang, C. -C. Wu, T. -T. Yeh, and Y. -T. Lian, Risk Factors for Nonunion in Patients with Intracapsular Femoral Neck Fractures Treated with Thre Cannulated Screws Placed in Either a Triangle or an Inverted Triangle Configuration, Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, vol. 95-A, pp.61-69, (2013).

DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.k.01081

Google Scholar

[2] T. -W. Huang, W. -H. Hsu, K. -T. Peng, and C. -Y. Lee, Effect of integrity of the posterior cortex in displaced femoral neck fractures on outcome after surgical fixation in young adults, Injury, vol. 42, pp.217-222, (2011).

DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.10.005

Google Scholar

[3] J. W. Oakey, M. D. Stover, H. D. Summers, M. Sartori, R. M. Havey, and A. G. Patwardhan, Does screw configuration affect subtrochanteric fracture after femoral neck fixation?, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, pp.302-306, (2006).

DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000188557.65387.fc

Google Scholar

[4] E. Walker, D. P. Mukherjee, A. L. Ogden, K. K. Sadasivan, and J. A. Albright, A Biomechanical Study of Simulated Femoral Neck Fracture Fixation by Cannulated Screws: Effects of Placement Angle and Number of screws, The America Journal of Orthopedic, vol. 36, pp.680-684, (2007).

Google Scholar

[5] O. Filipov, Biplane double-supported screw fixation (F-technique): a method of screw fixation at osteoporotic fractures of the femoral neck, European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, vol. 21, pp.539-543, 2011/10/01 (2011).

DOI: 10.1007/s00590-010-0747-9

Google Scholar

[6] C. A. Bout, D. M. Cannegieter, and J. W. Juttmann, Percutaneous cannulated screw fixation of femoral neck fractures: the three point principle, Injury, vol. 28, pp.135-139, (1997).

DOI: 10.1016/s0020-1383(96)00161-1

Google Scholar

[7] M. R. b. A. Kadir, Interface Micromotion in Cementless Hip Protheses, Doctor of Philosophy, Biomechanic Imperial College London, Imperial College London, (2005).

Google Scholar

[8] W. -P. Chen, C. -L. Tai, C. -H. Shih, P. -H. Hsieh, M. -C. Leou, and M. S. Lee, Selection of fixation devices in proximal femur rotational osteotomy: clinical complications and finite element analysis, Clinical Biomechanics, vol. 19, pp.255-262, (2004).

DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2003.12.003

Google Scholar

[9] P. J. Nowotarski, B. Ervin, B. Weatherby, J. Pettit, R. Goulet, and B. Norris, Biomechanical analysis of a novel femoral neck locking plate for treatment of vertical shear Pauwel's type C femoral neck fractures, Injury, vol. 43, pp.802-806, (2012).

DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.09.012

Google Scholar

[10] T. V. Ly and M. F. Swiontkowski, Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures in Young Adults, Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, vol. 90-A, pp.2254-266, (2008).

Google Scholar

[11] R. Mittal and S. Banerjee, Proximal femoral fractures: Principles of management and review of literature, Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma, vol. 3, pp.15-23, (2012).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2012.04.001

Google Scholar

[12] M. J. Parker and S. M. Ali, Short versus long thread cannulated cancellous screws for intracapsular hip fractures: A randomised trial of 432 patients, Injury, vol. 41, pp.382-384, (2010).

DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2009.10.008

Google Scholar

[13] S. M. Ali, S. Haleem, and M. J. Parker, Short- versus long-thread cannulated screws for intracapsular hip fractures: A randomised trial of 432 patients, Injury Extra, vol. 39, p.202, (2008).

DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2007.11.405

Google Scholar

[14] S. Sowmianarayanan, A. Chandrasekaran, and R. K. Kumar, Finite element analysis of a subtrochanteric fractured femur with dynamic hip screw, dynamic condylar screw, and proximal femur nail implants-a comparative study, Proc Inst Mech Eng H, vol. 222, pp.117-27, Jan (2008).

DOI: 10.1243/09544119jeim156

Google Scholar

[15] V. Tan, K. L. Wong, C. T. Born, R. Harten, and W. G. DeLong, Two-Screw Femoral Neck Fracture Fixation: A Biomechanical Analysis of 2 Different Configuration, The America Journal of Orthopedic, vol. 36, pp.481-485, (2007).

Google Scholar