Recycling of Aluminium - Developing Design Criteria for Aluminium Cans Compressor

Article Preview

Abstract:

Aluminium used in beverage containers or cans is a sustainable material and can be recycled repeatedly. In Malaysia, the activities of collecting aluminium beverage cans for recycle normally involve a process of compressing aluminium cans manually in order to reduce storage space. The cans compression process is very time consuming and unproductive. In addition, there is no standard aluminium cans compressor tool that available in the market currently. As such, this paper aims to identify users requirements on the potential tool that could be used to compress aluminium beverage cans, follows by transform the important users requirements to a set of design criteria for the development of aluminium cans compressor. In line with this, six important factors that influence users purchase decision on household product were identified from literature review. The important factors were adapted into a questionnaire to collect and identify users preferred requirements on aluminium cans compressor via Voice of Customer technique. Subsequently, Pareto analysis and t-test were applied to define the most important and significant users requirements that influenced user purchase decision. As a result, a list of important users requirements is generated, which is also served as the design criteria for the development of a new aluminium cans compressor. Finding from the paper suggested that the most important design criteria for the potential aluminium cans compressor are consisted of safety, cost, performance and reliability requirements.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

489-493

Citation:

Online since:

December 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Information on http: /www. aluminum. org.

Google Scholar

[2] G. Gaustad, E. Olivetti, R. Kirchain, Improving aluminium recycling: A survey of sorting and impurity removal technology, Resources. Conservation and Recycling. 58 (2012) 79-87.

DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.10.010

Google Scholar

[3] K.T. Ulrich, S.D. Eppinger, Product Design and Development, first ed., McGraw Hill, New York, (2004).

Google Scholar

[4] S. Hargrove. Manufacturing Technology: A system Approach to Fixture Planning and Design. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 10 (1995) 169 – 182.

DOI: 10.1007/bf01179345

Google Scholar

[5] A. Mital, A. Desai, A. Subramaniam, A. Mital, Product Development: A Structured Approach to Consumer Product Development Design, first ed., Elsevier, Oxford, (2008).

DOI: 10.1016/b978-075068309-8.50006-6

Google Scholar

[6] J. Cagain, C.M. Vogel, Creating Breakthrough Products: Revealing the secret that drive global innovation, second ed., FT Press, New Jersey, (2012).

Google Scholar

[7] J. Dyson, Against The Odds, second ed., Orion Business Books, London, (1997).

Google Scholar

[8] N.J. Robert, R. Adela, Design, Risk and New Product Development in Five Small Creative Companies. International Journal of Design. 2 (2008), 21-30.

Google Scholar

[9] C.H. Loch, S. Kavadias, Managing NPD: An evolutionary framework, in: Handbook of New Product Development Management. Elsevier, Oxford, 2008, pp.1-26.

Google Scholar

[10] R. Cooper, P. S. Schindler, Business Research Methods. First ed., Irwin, Toronto, (1988).

Google Scholar

[11] A. Rasli, Data analysis and beyond: A practical guide for post-graduate social scientists. First ed., Penerbit UTM, Skudai, (2006).

Google Scholar

[12] R. P. Dean, A. W. Gerrit, G. Cristiaan, Applying Multiple Perspectives to the Design of a Commercialization Process. R&D Management 38 (2008), 211-320.

Google Scholar

[13] O. Demirbilek, M. Park, A survey of criteria for the assessment of Good Product Design. The Fourth European Academy of Design Conference, 10th-12th April 2001, Portugal.

Google Scholar

[14] H. Karatsu, T. Ikeda, Mastering the tools of QC. First ed., PHP Institute, Singapore, (1987).

Google Scholar