AISI H13 Hot-Work Steel with Hard Chromium Plating Thermal Fatigue Behavior Evaluation

Article Preview

Abstract:

A hard-coating on hot work tool steel can be used to obtain higher corrosion resistance, as well as better wear resistance. This study investigates the thermal fatigue performance of AISI H13 hot work tool steel with and without hard chromium plating. Treated specimens were characterized using microstructural analysis, X-ray diffraction analysis and microhardness measurement. The thermal fatigue test is based on cyclic induction heating and water cooling. The specimen was heated to the maximum surface temperature of 670°C followed with water injection to bring the specimen down to a minimum temperature of 25°C. The thermal fatigue testing in this study was conducted using 500 cycles. A vacuum heat treated specimen with a hardness of 47 HRC was used as the reference material. The hard chromium plated layer with a thickness 35 μm had a hardness of 930 HV0.1. The damage factor, defined as crack depth × crack width, of quenched and tempered H13 specimens and hard chromium plated specimens were 800 and 1760, respectively. The damage factor evaluation verified the vacuum heat treated specimen thermal fatigue resistance is superior to that of the hard chromium plated specimen.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

8-13

Citation:

Online since:

November 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] .K. Rafi, G.D.J. Ram, G. Phanikumar and K.P. Rao: Mater. and Des. Vol. 32 (2011), p.82.

Google Scholar

[2] D.S. Ma, J. Zhou, Z.Z. Chen, Z.K. Zhang, Q.A. Chen and D.H. Li: J. Iron Steel Res. Vol. 16(5) (2009), p.56.

Google Scholar

[3] M. Koneshlou, K.M. Asl and F. Khomamizadeh: Cryogenics Vol. 51 (2011), p.55.

Google Scholar

[4] C. Wang, H. Zhou, P.Y. Lin, N. Sun, Q. Guo and P. Zhang: Mat. Desig. Vol. 31 (2010), p.3442.

Google Scholar

[5] P. Ans, J. Dillea and M. Degrez: Surf. Coat. Technol. Vol. 205 (2011), p.3378.

Google Scholar

[6] M.P. Nascimento, R.C. Souza, I.M. Miguel, W.L. Pigatin and H.J.C. Voorwald: Surf. Coat. Technol. Vol. 138 (2001), p.113.

Google Scholar

[7] J. Pina, A. Dias, M. Francois and J.L. Lebrun: Surf. Coat. Technol. Vol. 96 (1997), p.148.

Google Scholar

[8] T. Sahraoui, S. Guessasma, N.E. Fenineche, G. Montavon and C. Coddet: Mat. Lett. Vol. 58 (2004), p.654.

Google Scholar

[9] S.M.M. Hadavi, A.A. Zadeh and M.S. Jamshidi: J. of Mat. Proc. Technol. Vol. 147 (2004), p.385.

Google Scholar

[10] Y. Birol: Mater. Sci. Eng. A Vol. 527 (2010), p.6091.

Google Scholar

[11] S.H. Yeh, L.H. Chiu, W.C. Lo and C.L. Huang: Mat. Trans. Vol. 54 (2013), p.1187.

Google Scholar

[12] A. Persson, S. Hogmark and J. Bergstrom: Surf. Coat. Technol. Vol. 191 (2005), p.216.

Google Scholar