The Interaction of Mixing Odorants with Similar Chemical Properties: A Case Study on Ketone Compounds

Article Preview

Abstract:

To investigate more about the interaction of mixing odorants, a series of sensory tests were conducted using five ketones [butanone (Bu), 2-Pentanone (Pe), 2-Hexanone (Hex), 2-Heptanone (Hep), 2-Octanone (Oc)] at varying concentration levels. The determination of odor threshold (OT) was initially conducted by the triangle odor bag method (GB/T 14675, China). The odor activity values (OAVs) of individual odorants at a wide range of concentrations were derived from concentration-to-odor threshold ratios. The resulting data were then evaluated to define the empirical relationship for each ketone between the OAV and odor intensity (OI) scaling. Based on the relationships defined for each individual ketone, the OI values were estimated for a synthetic mixture of five ketones. The effect of mixing was then examined by assessing those estimated OI values with the actually measured OI values. The overall results of this study confirmed that the OI values of the synthetic mixture is not governed by the common theoretical basis (e.g., rule of additivity, synergism, or a stronger component model) but is best represented by the averaged contribution of all ketone components. Thus, the odor intensity (OI) of a given mixture sample containing odorants with similar chemical properties can be accessed through the conversion from its concentration value with the application of empirical equations instead of direct measurement by the human test panel.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 850-851)

Pages:

32-37

Citation:

Online since:

December 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] J. E. Cometto-Muniz, W. S. Cain and M. H. Abraham: Behav. Brain Res. Vol. 138 (2003), p.95.

Google Scholar

[2] D. G. Laing, G. Francis: Physiol. Behav. Vol. 46 (1989), p.809.

Google Scholar

[3] J. F. Delwiche, A. L. Heffelfinger: J. Sens. Stud. Vol. 20 (2005), p.512.

Google Scholar

[4] B. H. Smith: Physiol. Behav. Vol. 65 (1998), p.397.

Google Scholar

[5] H. T. Lawless: Food Qual. Preference Vol. 10 (1999), p.325.

Google Scholar

[6] K. -H. Kim: Sensors Vol. 10 (2010), p.7287.

Google Scholar

[7] D. G. Laing, H. Panhuber and B. Slotnick: Physiol. Behav. Vol. 46 (1989), p.689.

Google Scholar

[8] M. Laska, R. Hudson: Chem. Sens. Vol. 16 (1991), p.651.

Google Scholar

[9] T. Miyazawa, M. Gallagher, and G. Preti et al.: Chem. Sens. Vol. 33 (2008), p.363.

Google Scholar

[10] J. E. Cometto-Muñiz, W. S. Cain, and M. H. Abraham et al.: Physiol. Behav. Vol. 95 (2008), p.658. 11] X. Du, C. E. Finn and M. C. Qian: Food Chem. Vol. 119 (2010), p.1127.

Google Scholar

[12] SAC: Air quality-determination of odor-triangle odor bag method (GB/T 14675, Standardization Administration of China, SAC. Beijing 1993).

Google Scholar