Exposure Assessment of Nano-CaCO₃ Manufacturing Workplaces

Abstract:

Eight nanosized CaCO₃ (nanoCaCO₃) manufacturing workplaces in a plant were investigated for the possible exposure to nanoparticles (NPs). Personal sampling, area sampling, and real-time monitoring were performed using CPC (condensation particle counter) and OPC (optical particle counter) to characterize the mass exposure, particle size distribution, and particle number exposure. Only the mass concentration for area samplings in package and waste treatment workplaces were found to exceed the PNOS (particles not otherwise specified; 3 mg/m³) set by ACGIH (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists), but lower than the OELs (occupational exposure levels, 4.0 mg/m³) set by the China Ministry of Health for CaCO₃ fine, other workplaces were relatively lower than existing occupational exposure limits. The NPs and fine particles were most frequently released in package and waste treatment workplaces lacking of the engineering control. The mass concentration for area sampling in waste treatment workplace reached their highest values at 3.2647 mg/m³, while the number concentration in package workplace reached their highest values at 4.07×10¹¹ pt/m³. So the workplaces of package and recovering particles in nanoCaCO₃ handling progress were the major emission sources of NPs.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 850-851)
• Pages: 38-44
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.850-851.38
• Online since: December 2013
• Authors: Peng Zhao, Shi Chuan Tang*, Yu Qian Wang, Zai Yu, Jie Min Liu
• Keywords: CaCO₃ Nanoparticles, Mass Concentration, Number Concentration, Workplaces

References

[1] F. Allhoff, P. Lin and D. Moore: What is nanotechnology and why does it matter: from science to ethics (Oxford Publications, UK 2010).

DOI: 10.1002/9781444317992

[2] M. C. Roco: Environ. Sci. Technol. Vol. 39 (2005), p.106.

[3] R. J. Aitken, K. S. Creely, and C. L. Tran: Nanoparticles: An occupational hygiene review (HSE Books Publications, SCO 2004).

[4] EU OSHA: Workplace exposure to nanoparticles (EU OSHA Publications, Spain 2008).

[5] W. Kreyling, M. Semmler, and F. Erbe et al.: J. Toxicol. Environ. Health Vol. 65 (2002), p.1513.

[6] G. Oberdörster, Z. Sharp, and V. Atudorei et al.: J. Toxicol. Environ. Health Part A Vol. 65 (2002), p.1531.

[7] A. Elder, R. Gelein, and V. Silva et al.: Environ. Health Perspect. Vol. 114 (2006), p.1172.

[8] G. Oberdörster, Z. Sharp, and V. Atudore et al.: Inhal. Toxicol. Vol. 16 (2004), p.437.

[9] S. Kashiwada: Environ. Health Perspect. Vol. 114 (2006), p.1697.

[10] M. Geiser, B. Rothen-Rutishauser, and N. Kapp et al.: Environ. Health Perspect., Vol. 113 (2005), p.1555.

[11] ACGIH: Documentation of TLVs and BEIs (ACGIH Publications, US 2005).

[12] EU OSHA: Workplace exposure to nanoparticles (EU OSHA Publications, Spain 2009).

[13] NIOSH: Approaches to safe nanotechnology: Managing the health and safety concerns associated with engineered nanomaterials (NIOSH Publications, US 2009).

DOI: 10.26616/nioshpub2009125

[14] OECD: Emission assessment for identification of sources and release of airborne manufactured nanomaterials in the workplace (OECD Publications, France, 2009).

[15] NIOSH: Current intelligence bulletin: Evaluation of health hazard and recommendations for occupational exposure to titanium dioxide (NIOSH Publications, US 2011).

[16] NIOSH: Current intelligence bulletin: Occupational exposure to carbon nanotubes and carbon nanofibers (NIOSH Publications, US, 2013).

[17] T. M. Peters, W. A. Heitbrink, and D. E. Evans et al.: Ann. Occup. Hyg. Vol. 50 (2006), p.249.