A Hybrid Approach of TOPSIS for Weapon Systems Selection

Article Preview

Abstract:

Selecting a weapon system is an unstructured, complex decision problem with lots of aspects that must be considered. This paper presents a hybrid approach for use in the selecting of weapon systems. The hybrid approach combines analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and Information Entropy Method (IEM) to assign weights to the criteria to be used in weapon systems selection. These weights are then inputted into a TOPSIS (the technique for preference by similarity to ideal solution) model to determine the best alternative among the weapon systems. At last, a case is studied to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach. Results indicate that decision support provided by the approach could offset the shortcomings better than AHP alone and therefore provide more reasonable decisions.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 850-851)

Pages:

432-436

Citation:

Online since:

December 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] T.L. Saaty: The Analytic Hierarchy Process (RWS Publications, USA 1990).

Google Scholar

[2] Vaidya and S. Kumar: J. European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 169 (2004) no. 1, p.1–29.

Google Scholar

[3] G. Isiklar, G. Buyukozkan: J. Computer Standards & Interfaces, vol. 29 (2006) no. 2, pp.265-274.

Google Scholar

[4] M.C. Lin, C.C. Wang, M.S. Chen et al: J. Computers in Industry, vol. 59 (2008), pp.17-31.

Google Scholar

[5] M.A. Greiner, J.W. Fowler, D.L. Shunk, et al: J. IEEE Transaction on Engineering Management, vol. 50 (2003) no. 2, pp.192-203.

Google Scholar

[6] C.H. Cheng, K.L. Yang, C.L. Hwang: J. European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 116 (1999) no. 2, pp.423-435.

Google Scholar

[7] B.L. Golden, E.A. Wasil, and P.T. Harker: The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Applications and Studies (Springer-Verlag, USA 1989).

Google Scholar

[8] P. Prachee, Y. Sailu, R. Akash, et al: J. Bioinformatics, vol. 21 (2005) no. 10, pp.2161-2166.

Google Scholar

[9] Hwang C L, Yoon K: Multiple attribute decision making (Springer-Verlag, USA 1981).

Google Scholar

[10] H.S. Shih, H.J. Shyurb, L.E. Stanley: J. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, vol. 45 (2007), pp.801-813.

Google Scholar