Applied Technology in the Grid Workflow Quality of Service Calculation and Estimation

Article Preview

Abstract:

For the grid workflow system include a large of candidate services, the activity scheduling in workflow’s ex-ecution base on quality of service (QoS) constraints can pro-vide optimal service for users. This paper established the QoS’s parameter system with applied technology of grid workflow, and introduced the each parameter’s calculation model of activity’s QoS, the grid work-flow’s QoS estimation method based on the basic flow control structures defined by the abstract grid workflow language (AGWL). The experimental results show that the calculation method in this paper can estimate stably QoS parameter values of grid workflow combining with the multi candidate services, and, can provide a reasonable basis for process scheduling based on QoS constraints.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

531-536

Citation:

Online since:

December 2013

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Foster I, Kesselman C, Tuecke S. The Anatomy of the Grid: Enabling Scalable Virtual Organizations, International Journal of Supercom-puter Application and High Performance Computing, vol. 15, No. 3, pp.200-222., (2001).

DOI: 10.1177/109434200101500302

Google Scholar

[2] Cybok D. A Grid Workflow Infrastructure [A]. Workshop on Grid Workflow[C]. Berlin: GGF-10, (2004).

Google Scholar

[3] ZHOU Jian-tao, YE Xin-ming, A Review on the Grid Workflow and Its Key Technologies, Journal of Inner Mongolia University, vol. 39, No. 5, 2008, pp.581-589, (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[4] Foster I, Kesselman, Nick J, et al. The Physiology of the Grid: An Open Grid Services Architecture for Distributed Systems Integration, [R]. Globus Project, http: /www. globus. org/research /papers /ogsa. pdf.

Google Scholar

[5] Cardorso J, Miller J, Sheth A, et al. Modeling Quality of Service for Workflow and Web Service Processes, ,Web semantics Journal: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, vol. 1,No. 3, pp.281-308., (2004).

DOI: 10.1016/j.websem.2004.03.001

Google Scholar

[6] Parel C, Supekar K, lee Y. A QoS Oriented Framerwork for adaptive Management of Web Service based Workflows, , in proceeding of Database and Expert System 2003 Conference, Springer, 2003, pp.823-835.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-45227-0_80

Google Scholar

[7] Wang Li, Yuan Yaxing, LongHao, Wang Yong, Design on QoS-based workflow negotiation model in grid environment, JOURNAL OF JIANGSU UNIERSITY(Natural Science Edition), vol. 30, No. 1, 2009, pp.71-74, (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[8] Y. Wang, C. Hu, and Z. Du. QoS wared grid workflow schedule, Journal of Software, vol. 17, No. 11, pp.2341-2351. 2006, (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[9] LI Jin zhong, LIANG Zheng you. Quality of service estimation research based on the AGWL grid workflow model, Journal of Com-puter Applications, vol. 29, No. 1, pp.323-325, 2009, (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[10] Qian Tao, Huiyou Chang, Yang Yi, Chunqin Gu, Yang Yu. QoS Constrained Grid Workflow Scheduling Optimization Based on a Novel PSO Algorithm, in proceeding of 2009 Eighth International Conference on Grid and Cooperative Computing, 2009, pp.153-159.

DOI: 10.1109/gcc.2009.39

Google Scholar

[11] Askalon. Cloud and Grid Application Development and Computing Environment, http: /www. dps. uibk. ac. at/projects/agwl.

Google Scholar

[12] Fahringer T., Qin J, Hainzer S. Specification of grid workflow appli-cations with AGWL: An abstract grid workflow language, CCGrid 2005: Proceedings of IEEE International Symposiumon Cluster Com-puting and the Grid, Cardiff UK: IEEE Computer Society Press, (2005).

DOI: 10.1109/ccgrid.2005.1558629

Google Scholar

[13] J. Kennedy and R. Eberhart, A discrete binary version of the particle swarm algorithm, , Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, vol. 5, pp.4104-4108, (1997).

DOI: 10.1109/icsmc.1997.637339

Google Scholar

[14] Q. Pan, M. F. Tasgetiren, and Y. Liang, A discrete particle swarm optimization algorithm for the no wait flowshop scheduling probl-em, Computers & Operations Research, vol. 35, No. 9, 2008, pp.2807-2839.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cor.2006.12.030

Google Scholar

[15] C. Liao, C. Tseng, and P. Luarn, A discrete version of particle swarm optimization for flowshop scheduling problems, Computers & Operations Research, vol. 34, No. 10, 2007, pp.3099-3111.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cor.2005.11.017

Google Scholar

[16] M. R. AlRashidi, and M. E. El-Hawary, Hybrid particle swarm opti-mization approach for solving the discrete OPF problem considering the valve loading effects, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 22, No. 4, 2007, p.2030-(2038).

DOI: 10.1109/tpwrs.2007.907375

Google Scholar

[17] J. Wu, J. Zhu, G. Chen, and H. Zhang, Hybrid method for optimal scheduling of short term electric power generation of cascaded hydroelectric plants based on particle swarm optimization and chanceconstrained programming, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 23, No. 4, 2008, pp.1570-1579.

DOI: 10.1109/tpwrs.2008.2004822

Google Scholar

[18] S. NemaA, J. Goulermas, G. Sparrow, and P. Cook, Hybrid particle swarm branch-and-bound (HPB) optimizer for mixed discrete nonlinear programming., IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans, vol. 38, No. 6, 2008, pp.1411-1423.

DOI: 10.1109/tsmca.2008.2003536

Google Scholar

[19] S. L. Ho, S. Yang, G. Ni, E. W. C. Lo, and H. C. Wong, A particle swarm optimization based method for multi objective design optimizations, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 41, No. 5, 2005, pp.1756-1759.

DOI: 10.1109/tmag.2005.846033

Google Scholar

[20] J. S. Heo, K. Y. Lee, and R. Garduno-Ramirez, Multiobjective control of power plant using particle swarm optimization techniques, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, vol. 21, No. 2, 2006, pp.552-561.

DOI: 10.1109/tec.2005.858078

Google Scholar

[21] D. Liu, K. C. Tan, C. K. Goh, and W. K. Ho, A multi objective memetic algorithm based on particle swarm optimization, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics, vol. 37, No. 1, 2007, pp.42-50.

DOI: 10.1109/tsmcb.2006.883270

Google Scholar