Comparison of Coal Ash and Activated Carbon for Removal of Humic Acid from Aqueous Solution

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper presents the adsorption behaviors of humic acid (HA) on coal ashes and powdered activated carbons (PACs). A bituminous coal, with or without calcium-loading, was used as a feedstock for coal ash preparation. The working solution of HA with a concentration of 20 mg/L was used in all adsorption tests. The results showed that calcium-enriched coal ash (CECA) gave rise to the removal rate of HA as high as 84.05%, much higher than those of raw coal ash (RCA) and PACs. The impacts of solution pH and adsorbent dosage on HA adsorption capacity were also investigated. It was found that lower pH facilitated to the removal of HA from aqueous solution by means of CECA, and the optimal CECA dosage was about 1.0g/L at pH 7.00. The data obtained in this study suggested that calcium-enriched coal ash could be useful and cost-effective in the treatment of wastewaters containing HA-like organic macro-molecules.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 864-867)

Pages:

1509-1512

Citation:

Online since:

December 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] M.S. Wang, L.B. Liao and X.L. Zhang and Z.H. Li: Applied Clay Science Vol. 67-68 (2012), p.164–168.

Google Scholar

[2] W. Yuan and A.L. Zydney: Journal of Membrane Science Vol. 157 (1999), p.1–12.

Google Scholar

[3] C.F. Lin, T.Y. Lin and O.J. Hao: Water Research Vol. 34 (2000), p.1097–1106.

Google Scholar

[4] J.R. Meier, R.D. Lingg and R.J. Bull: Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology Vol. 118 (1983), p.25–41.

Google Scholar

[5] R.B. Bai and X. Zhang: Journal of Colloid and Interface Science Vol. 243 (2001), pp.52-60.

Google Scholar

[6] S.B. Wang and H.W. Wu: Journal of Hazardous Materials Vol. 136 (2006), p.482–501.

Google Scholar

[7] S.B. Wang, Z.H. Zhu: Journal of Colloid and Interface Science Vol. 315 (2007), p.41–46.

Google Scholar

[8] A. Imyim and E. Prapalimrungsi; Journal of Hazardous Materials, Vol. 184 (2010), p.775–781.

Google Scholar

[9] A.A.M. Daifullah, B.S. Girgis and H.M.H. Gad: Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects Vol. 235 (2004), p.1–10.

Google Scholar

[10] J.M. Duan, F. Wilson, N. Graham and J.H. Tay: Desalination Vol. 151 (2002), p.53–66.

Google Scholar

[11] X.J. Peng, Z.K. Luan, F.T. Chen, B.J. Tian and P.J. Zhi: Desalination, Vol. 174 (2005), p.135–143.

Google Scholar

[12] J.M. Duan, J.H. Wang, N. Graham and F. Wilson: Desalination Vol. 150 (2002), p.1–14.

Google Scholar

[13] N. Kloster, M. Brigante, G. Zanini and M. Avena: Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects Vol. 427 (2013), p.76–82.

DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2013.03.030

Google Scholar

[14] M. Brigante, G. Zanini and M. Avena: Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects Vol. 294 (2007), p.64–70.

Google Scholar

[15] S.B. Wang, Q. Ma and Z.H. Zhu: Fuel Vol. 87 (2008), p.3469–3473.

Google Scholar

[16] M. Baalousha, M. Motelica-Heino and P. Le Coustume: Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects Vol. 272(2006), p.48–55.

Google Scholar