Experimental Study of the Fly Ash Iron Morphology Effect on Flue Gas Mercury Removal

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this paper, magnetic beads were separated from two different power plants fly ash by magnetic separation, and the separated magnetic beads were analyzed by XRD. In a self-built fixed-bed system, the experiments that magnetic beads from two power plants, α-Fe2O3 and γ-Fe2O3 affect formation distribution of mercury in flue gas were carried out. The results showed that the magnetic beads in fly ash have a certain capacity to oxidize the mercury in flue gas, and the γ-Fe2O3 has greater influence on the species distribution of mercury than α- Fe2O3.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 864-867)

Pages:

1513-1518

Citation:

Online since:

December 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Constance L. Senior, Adel F. Sarofim, et al. Gas-phase transformations of mercury in coal-fired power plants. Fuel Processing technology, 2000 (63): 197-213.

DOI: 10.1016/s0378-3820(99)00097-1

Google Scholar

[2] W.H. Gibb, F. Clarke, A.K. Mehta. The fate of coal mercury during combustion. Fuel Processing technology, 2000 (65-66): 365-377.

DOI: 10.1016/s0378-3820(99)00104-6

Google Scholar

[3] James C. Hower, Constance L. Senior, Eric M. Suuberg, Robert H. Hurt, Jennifer L. Wilcox, Edwin S. Olson. Mercury capture by native fly ash carbons in coal-fired power plants, Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2010, (36): 510–529.

DOI: 10.1016/j.pecs.2009.12.003

Google Scholar

[4] Grant E. Dunham, Raymond A. DeWall, Constance L. Senior, Fixed-bed studies of the interactions between mercury and coal combustion fly ash, Fuel Processing Technology, 2003 (82): 197–213.

DOI: 10.1016/s0378-3820(03)00070-5

Google Scholar

[5] Glenn A. Norton, Hongqun Yang, Robert C. Brown, Dennis L. Laudal, Grant E. Dunham, John Erjavec, Heterogeneous oxidation of mercury in simulated post combustion conditions, Fuel 2003 (82): 107–116.

DOI: 10.1016/s0016-2361(02)00254-5

Google Scholar

[6] Galbreath K C, Zygarlicke C J, et al. Effects of NOx, α-Fe2O3, γ-Fe2O3, and HCl on Mercury Transformations in a 7-kW Coal Combustion System; Fuel Process Technol. 2005, 86: 429-448.

DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2004.03.003

Google Scholar