The Comparison Study of Four Lab Scale Microalgae Collection Ways

Ji Jun Du; Ping Zeng; Fan Zhang; Chen Hao Wang

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.875-877.1729

Paper Titles

Lightning Protection Research and Simulation of High-Speed Railway Catenary
p.1707

Design Considerations of in-Plane Nanoelectromechanical Switches with Corrugation Beams for Low Voltage Logic Applications
p.1712

Influence of Input Material Kind on Thermic System Furnace Efficiency
p.1716

Control of Grid Voltage Feed-Forward and Crowbar Circuit for DC-Bus Voltage
p.1723

The Comparison Study of Four Lab Scale Microalgae Collection Ways
p.1729

Study on Modeling and Simulating of Micro-Powers and Micro-Grid Construction
p.1734

600 MW Direct Air-Cooling Unit Back-Pressure Optimization and Theoretical Analysis
p.1739

Thermoeconomic Optimization of a 1000MW Coal-Fired Unit
p.1744

Thermoeconomic Analysis of Air Conditioning Systems
p.1748

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vols. 875-877The Comparison Study of Four Lab Scale Microalgae...

The Comparison Study of Four Lab Scale Microalgae Collection Ways

Abstract:

Microalgae are a form of prospective biomass energy. Cultivation of wild mixed microalgae not only develop a new way for biomass energy production, but reduce the emission of carbon dioxide in flue gas, which is important to the alleviation of global climate change. The production of bio-flues using microalgae included microalgae cultivation, harvesting and product post-treatment. The cost-effective microalgae harvesting ways was beneficial for all the production process. This study was carried out on the basis of microalgae cultivation. The microalgae collection ways including centrifuge, filtration by slow filter paper, 13# and 25# plankton net were compared, the results showed that, the algae cell collection efficiency decreased as follows, centrifuge > filtration by slow filter paper >25# plankton net>13# plankton net. For the same collection way, the collection efficiency had a little difference according to different microalgae species. The most suitable collection way was centrifuge for the microalgae cultivation in lab.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 875-877)

Pages:

1729-1733

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.875-877.1729

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

February 2014

Authors:

Ji Jun Du, Ping Zeng, Fan Zhang, Chen Hao Wang

Keywords:

Centrifuge, Collection Efficiency, Filtration, Microalgae, Plankton Net

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] M. F. Demirbas, M. Balat, H. Balat, Energy Conversion and Management, 50(10), 1746 (2009).

DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2009.03.013

Google Scholar

[2] B. Mischa, R. Danyel , Research of Environmental Sciences, 19(S1), 109 ( 2006).

Google Scholar

[3] Q. Y. Zhou, T. Y. Gao, Microbiology of Environmental Engineering. Higher Education Press, Beijing. (2000).

Google Scholar

[4] L. De Schamphelaire, W. Verstraete, Biotechnol Bioeng, 103(2), 296 (2009).

Google Scholar

[5] K. Skjanes, P. Lindblad, J. Muller, Biomolecular Engineering, 24(4), 405 (2007).

Google Scholar

[6] S. R. Chae, E. J. Hwang, H. S. Shin, Bioresource Technol, 97(2), 322 (2006).

Google Scholar

[7] Gudin C，Therpenier C. Bioconversion of solar energy into organic chemicals by microalgae[J]. Adv Biotechnol Processes，1986，6：73-110.

Google Scholar

[8] E. Molina Grima，E. -H. Belarbi F.G. Acie´n Ferna´ndez et al. Recovery of microalgal biomass and metabolites：process options and economics[J]. Biotechnology Advances，2003，20: 491-500.

DOI: 10.1016/s0734-9750(02)00050-2

Google Scholar