The Influence of Total Solid and Inoculum Ratio on Thermophilic Anaerobic Digestion of Waste Activated Sludge

Article Preview

Abstract:

Compared to conventional mesophilic anaerobic digestion, thermophilic anaerobic digestion may offer attractive advantages such as higher volatile solid destruction efficiency, higher biogas generation, and higher disinfection effect and better dewater ability. In this study, two experiments of waste activated sludge were conducted to evaluate the influence of total solid and inoculums ratio on the biogas production and thermophilic (55±1°C) anaerobic process stability. In first experiment, the biogas production of 4 reactors with solid concentration of 6%, 8%, 10% and 12% respectively was observed. The biogas productions in 4 reactors were 4444 mL, 4891 mL, 5573 mL and 6327 mL respectively, the biogas productions per unit VS digested of each group were all above 360 mL/g and the methane content in biogas of each reactor was kept about 70%. During the operation, pH value in the reactor was kept between 6.5 and 8.4. In second experiment, the biogas production of 4 reactors with inoculums ratio of 20%, 30%, 40% and 50% respectively was observed. The biogas productions in 4 reactors were 4730 mL, 6630 mL, 6820 mL and 7175 mL respectively, the biogas productions per unit VS digested of each group were all above 340 mL/g and the methane content in biogas of each reactor was kept about 70%. During the operation, pH value in the reactor was kept between 6.4 and 8.6. Putting into consideration, the shortening of anaerobic digestion cycle, costs saving, and increasing economic benefits; choosing TS within the scope of 8-10%and inoculums ratio within the scope of 30-40% are more recommended. And the results showed that thermophilic anaerobic digestion process for waste activated sludge could be operated steadily.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

670-678

Citation:

Online since:

January 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Chi, Y., et al., Enhancement of thermophilic anaerobic digestion of thickened waste activated sludge by combined microwave and alkaline pretreatment. Journal of Environmental Sciences. 23(2011) 1257-1265.

DOI: 10.1016/s1001-0742(10)60561-x

Google Scholar

[2] Deleris S, Geaugey V, Camacho P, et al. Minimization of sludge production in biological processes an alternative solution for the problem of sludge disposal. Water Science and Technology. 46(2002) 63-70.

DOI: 10.2166/wst.2002.0291

Google Scholar

[3] Abe, N., et al., Development of an efficient process for the treatment of residual sludge discharged from an anaerobic digester in a sewage treatment plant. Bioresource Technology. 102(2011) 7641-7644.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.05.030

Google Scholar

[4] Climent, M., et al., Effects of thermal and mechanical pretreatments of secondary sludge on biogas production under thermophilic conditions. Chemical Engineering Journal. 133(2007) 335-342.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2007.02.020

Google Scholar

[5] FerrerIvet, Felicitas Vazquez, Xavier Font. Long term operation of a thermophilic anaerobic reactor: Process stability and efficiency at decreasing sludge retention time. Bioresource Technology. 101(2010) 2972-2980.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.12.006

Google Scholar

[6] APHA-AWWA-WPCF. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 20th ed. Washington, DC. (1998).

Google Scholar

[7] Harikishan S, Shihwu Sung. Cattle waste treatment and Class A biosolid production using temperature-phased anaerobic digester. Advances in Environmental Research. 7(2003) 701-706.

DOI: 10.1016/s1093-0191(02)00034-5

Google Scholar

[8] Liu Xiaoling, Li Shizhong, Liu Jianshuang, etal. Evaluation of high-solids anaerobic digestion process for converting excess sludge to biogas. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae. 31(2001) 955-963.

Google Scholar

[9] Forster-Carneiro, T, Pérez, M., Romero, L.I. Anaerobic digestion of municipal solid wastes: dry thermophilic performance. Bioresource Technology. 99(2008) 8180-8184.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.03.021

Google Scholar

[10] Kim HW, Han SK, Shin HS. Anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge and food waste using temperature-phased anaerobic digestion process. Water Science and Technology. 50(2004) 107-114.

DOI: 10.2166/wst.2004.0547

Google Scholar

[11] Shim H S, Kang S T. Characteristics and fates of soluble microbial products in ceramic membrane bioreactor at various sludge retention times. Water Research. 37(2003) 121-127.

DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1354(02)00249-x

Google Scholar

[12] Alexis Mottet, Emilie Francois, Eric Latrille, et al. Estimating anaerobic biodegradability indicators for waste activated sludge. Chemical Engineering Journal. 160(2010) 488-496.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2010.03.059

Google Scholar

[13] Riau V, De la Rubia MA, Perez M. Temperature-phased anaerobic digestion (TPAD) to obtain Class A biosolids. A discontinuous study. Bioresource Technology. 101(2010) 65-70.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.07.072

Google Scholar

[14] Palatsi J, Gimenez-Lorang A, Ferrer I, etal. 2009. Start-up strategies of thermophilic anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge. Water Science and Technology. 59(9): 1777-1784.

DOI: 10.2166/wst.2009.180

Google Scholar

[15] FerrerIvet., Ponsa Sergio., Vazquez Felicitas, etal. Increasing biogas production bythermal (70℃) sludge pre-treatment prior to thermophilic anaerobic digestion. Biochemical Engineering Journal. 42(2008) 186-192.

DOI: 10.1016/j.bej.2008.06.020

Google Scholar

[16] MoonilKim, Young-Ho Ahn, R. E. Speece. Comparative process stability and efficiency of anaerobic digestion; mesophilic VS. thermophilic. Water Resource. 36(2002) 4369-4385.

DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1354(02)00147-1

Google Scholar

[17] Irene Siegert, Charles Banks. The effect of volatile fatty acid additions on the anaerobicdigestion of cellulose and glucose in batch reactors. Process Biochemistry. 40(2005) 3412-3418.

DOI: 10.1016/j.procbio.2005.01.025

Google Scholar

[18] DumasC., PerezS., PaulE., et al. Combined thermophilic aerobic process and conventional anaerobic digestion: Effect on sludge biodegradation and methane production. Bioresource Technology. 101(2010) 2629-2636.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.10.065

Google Scholar

[19] Li Laiqing, Li xiujin, ZhengMingxia, et al. Comparison of anaerobic biogas ification performances of concentrated and dewatered sludges from different locations. Journal of Beijing University of Chemical Technology. 34(2007) 16-19.

Google Scholar