Applying of Electrical Imaging Survey (EIS) to Evaluate Leachate Pollution in Underground Area of Informal Landfill

Article Preview

Abstract:

An informal landfill is an open dump that pollutes the underground environment because it lacks an impervious liner. The leakage of such a landfill is unidirectional and thus difficult to directly test. This study uses electrical imaging survey to evaluate the pollution of the underground environment of an informal landfill for municipal solid waste in Beijing. We hypothesize that every location has a specific resistivity resulting from the leachate. We use the membership function of fuzzy mathematics to quantitatively represent the pollution of the underground environment in the sanitary landfill. The results are consistent with borehole data.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

739-745

Citation:

Online since:

January 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Deize Dias Lopes, Sandra M.C.P. Silva et al. Establishing indices for groundwater contamination risk assessment in the vicinity of hazardous waste landfills in China Environmental Pollution, Volume 165, June 2012, Pages 77-90.

DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2011.12.042

Google Scholar

[2] Ying Li, Jinhui Li, Shusheng Chen, Weihua Diao. Establishing indices for groundwater contamination risk assessment in the vicinity of hazardous waste landfills in China. Environmental Pollution, Volume 165, June 2012, Pages 77-90.

DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2011.12.042

Google Scholar

[3] Fanny Genelle, Colette Sirieix, Joëlle Riss, Véronique Naudet. Monitoring landfill cover by electrical resistivity tomography on an experimental site. Engineering Geology, Volumes 145–146, 7 September 2012, Pages 18-29.

DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2012.06.002

Google Scholar

[4] Mohamed H. Khalil. Magnetic, geo-electric, and groundwater and soil quality analysis over a landfill from a lead smelter, Cairo, Egypt. Journal of Applied Geophysics, Volume 86, November 2012, Pages 146-159.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2012.08.004

Google Scholar

[5] M.H. Loke, J.E. Chambers, D.F. Rucker, O. Kuras, P.B. Recent developments in the direct-current geoelectrical imaging method. Journal of Applied Geophysics, Volume 95, August 2013, Pages 135-156.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2013.02.017

Google Scholar

[6] B. Texkan. A joint application of radiomagnetotellurics and Transient electromagnetics to the investigation of waste Deposit in Cologne. Journal of Application Geophysics, 1996,34 (3):199-212.

DOI: 10.1016/0926-9851(95)00016-x

Google Scholar

[7] A.K. Benson. Mapping groundwater contamination using DC resistivity and VLF geophysical method-A case study. Geophysics, 1997,62(1):80-86.

DOI: 10.1190/1.1444148

Google Scholar

[8] S. Park. Fluid migration in the vadose zone from 3D inversion of resistivity monitoring data. Geophysics, 1998,63(1):41-51.

DOI: 10.1190/1.1444326

Google Scholar

[9] R. Ogily. Imaging of industrial waste deposits and burred quarry geometry by 3D resistivity tomography. European Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, 1999,3: 103-113.

Google Scholar

[10] G. Buselli. Groundwater contamination monitoring with multichannel electrical and electromagnetic methods. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 2001,48(1):11-23.

DOI: 10.1016/s0926-9851(01)00055-6

Google Scholar

[11] Yan Y L, Ma X B, et al. Appliacation of magnetotelluric method in groundwater pollution detection on Asuwei refuse sannitary landfill. Chinese J. Geophys. 2007,50(6): 1863-1868.

Google Scholar

[12] R. Alaia , D. Patella and P. Mauriello. Application of geophysical 3D probability tomography in a test-site of the archaeological park of Pompei. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering 2008, 5: 67-76.

DOI: 10.1088/1742-2132/5/1/007

Google Scholar

[13] W. Daily and A. Ramirez. Electrical resistance tomography experiments at the Oregon Graduate Institute, Journal of Applied Geophysics 1995, 33: 227-237.

DOI: 10.1016/0926-9851(95)90043-8

Google Scholar

[14] S. Friedel, A. Thielen and S.M. Springman . Investigation of a slope endangered by rainfall-induced landslides using 3D resistivity tomography and geotechnical testing. Journal of applied Geophysics 2006, 60: 100-114.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2006.01.001

Google Scholar

[15] C. Hauck and D.V. Muhll. Using DC resistivity tomography to detect and characterize mountain permafrost, Geophysical Prospecting 2003, 51: 273-284.

DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2478.2003.00375.x

Google Scholar

[16] L. Lapenna and P. Lorenzo. 2D electrical imaging of some complex landslides in the Lucanian Apennine chain, Southern Italy, Geophysics 2005, 70: B11-B18.

DOI: 10.1190/1.1926571

Google Scholar

[17] P. Mauriello, D. Monna and D. Patella. 3D geoelectrical tomography and archaeological applications. Geophysical Prospecting 1998, 46: 543-570.

DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2478.1998.00102.x

Google Scholar

[18] L.A. Zadeh. Fuzzy set. Information and Control. 1965, 8: 338-353.

Google Scholar

[19] Jiang , W. W. et al. , Spatial data integration techniques for strateg icmineral exploration, U. M. Geophysics Technical Repor t, No. 16, (1995).

Google Scholar

[20] Zimmermann, H. Fuzzy set theory and its application. Kluwer AcademicPubl. (1985).

Google Scholar

[21] Moon, W. M. , Integ ration of geophysical, geolog ical and r emote sensing datausing fuzzy set theory, Extended abstract, ISME- AI. 90 ( Toky o) 1990, 98- 103.

Google Scholar

[22] An, P. et al. , Application of fuzzy set theory to integr ated miner al exploration, Can. J. Exploration Geophysics, Vol. 27, No. 1, 1991, 1- 11.

Google Scholar