Study on Advanced Pretreatment of Seawater by Electrolysis

Article Preview

Abstract:

The advanced pretreatment by electrolysis of Bohai seawater in Tianjin used a diaphragm electrolyzer in the experiment. Removal efficiency and influence factors of the method were analyzed. Results show that turbidity, organic compounds, SDI and chroma of seawater were effectively decreased by electrolysis. Removal efficiency was significantly increased by current density, operation time and inter-electrode distance, and the optimum electrolytic conditions was determined as inter-electrode distance of 2 cm, current density of 15.87 mA·cm-2, operation time of 10 minutes. It was investigated that when the water quality after electrolysis was of pH 8.6, the chroma and turbidity decreasing trend slowed down, with chroma of 0.052 A, removal rate reached 88.4%; the residual turbidity reduced to 2.52 NTU, removal rate reached 90.71%. A PH of about 8.5, CODCr decreasing trend slowed down, and when CODCr < 750 mg/L, it conformed to the requirements of the reverse osmosis water.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 881-883)

Pages:

598-603

Citation:

Online since:

January 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Jilun Yao, Haixiu Hu and Tian Wu ect. Pretreatment Options of Reverse Osmosis Desalination. [J]. Water and Wastewater Engineering, 2001, 17(8): 39-47. In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[2] Gang Wei, Qing Zhou, Rongchun Xiong. Green chemistry and Green Technologies in Water Treatment [J]. Modern Chemical Industry, 2002, 22(12): 43-46. In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[3] Ximei Luo and Xiong Tong. Treatment and Applications of Industrial Acidic Wastewater[J].Mining and Metallurgy, 2009, 12(4): 18. In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[4] Lie Wang. Technology and Prospects of Natural magnesium Hydroxide in Industrial Wastewater Treatment [J]. Non-ferrous Mining and Metallurgy,2005,7(21):105-106.

Google Scholar