Optimization of Culture Conditions ,Separation and Purification of a Lipopeptide Biosurfactant from Pseudomonas palleronii S6X

Article Preview

Abstract:

The influences of environmental factors on biomass and yield of biosurfactant were investigated by the single factor experiment. The optimal culture conditions of Pseudomonas palleronii S6X are: sucrose as carbon source, soy peptone as nitrogen source, 0.5% NaCl, pH7.0. The optimal fermention conditions of Pseudomonas palleronii S6X strain are: 3.0% inoculum, 30°C, 50ml medium volume(250ml flask). Under this condition, maximal biomass increase 17.1%, biosurfactant yield increase 33.3% Crude product biosurfactant was obtained by acid precipitation method, and the output is 1.33g/l. Crude product biosurfactant was extracted with dichloromethane and lyophilized. The lyophilized product of biosurfactant was isolated by Sephadex LH-20 column, the yield of primary purification product was reached 82.5%The primary purification product was purified by ODS column further, the yield of second pure product was reached 70%The pure product was identified as a lipopeptide by TLC.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 881-883)

Pages:

801-805

Citation:

Online since:

January 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Abalos A., Pinazo A., Infante M.R., Casals M., Garcia F., Manresa M.A. Physicochemical and Antimicrobial Properties of New Rhamnolipids Produced by Pseudomonas aeruginosa AT10 from Soybean Oil Refinery Wastes[J]. Langmuir, 2001. 17(5), 1367-1371.

DOI: 10.1021/la0011735

Google Scholar

[2] Mata-Sandoval J.C., Kams,J., Torrents A . High-performance liquid cheomatography method for the characterization of rhamnolipid mixtures produced by Pseudomonas aeruginosa UG2 on corn oil source[J]. Chromatography(A), 1999. 864(2): 211-220.

DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9673(99)00979-6

Google Scholar

[3] Christan von Corswant, Camilla Olsson, Olle Soderman. Microemulsions Based on Soybean Phosphatidyline and Isopropylmyristate-Effect of Addition Hydrophilic Surfactants [J]. Langmuir, 1998. 14, 6864-6870.

DOI: 10.1021/la980567h

Google Scholar

[4] Sung-Chyr Lin, Kuo-Ging Lin , Chih-Chen Lo, et al. Enhanced biosurfactant production by Bacillus licheniformis mutant. Enzyme Microbiol Technol, 1998, 23: 267-273.

DOI: 10.1016/s0141-0229(98)00049-0

Google Scholar

[5] Mata-Sandoval J.C., Kams,J., Torrents A . Effect of nutritional and environmental conditions on the productiong and composition of rhamnolipids by Pseudomonas aeruginosa UG2. Microbiol Res. 2001, 155: 249-256.

DOI: 10.1016/s0944-5013(01)80001-x

Google Scholar

[6] D.K. Jain, D. L. 6. D K Jain, D L Collins-Thompson, H Lee et al. A drop-collapsing test for screening surfactant-producing microorganisms. J Microbiol Methods. 1991, 13: 271~279.

DOI: 10.1016/0167-7012(91)90064-w

Google Scholar

[7] Cooper, D. G., B.G. Goldenberg. Surface active agents from two Bacillus species. Appl. Environ. Microbol, 1987, 53(2): 224~229.

DOI: 10.1128/aem.53.2.224-229.1987

Google Scholar

[8] Jitendra D. Desai, Ibrahim M, Banat. Microbial production of surfactant and their commercial potential. Microbiol Mol Biol Reviews. 1997, 61(1): 47-64.

DOI: 10.1128/mmbr.61.1.47-64.1997

Google Scholar

[9] Marcia Nitschke, Glaucia Maria Pastore. Production and properties of a surfactant obtained from Bacillus subtilis grown on cassava wastewater. Bioresource technology. 2006, 97: 336~341.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2005.02.044

Google Scholar

[10] Okerentugba, P.O. and O.U. Ezerony, 2003. Petroleum degrading potentials of single and mixed microbial cultures isolated from rivers and refinery effluent in Nigeria. Afr. J. Biotechnol., 2: 288-292.

DOI: 10.5897/ajb2003.000-1058

Google Scholar

[11] Urum, K., S. Grigson, T. Pekdemir and S. McMenamy, 2006. A comparison of the efficiency of different surfactants for removal of crude oil from contaminated soils. Chemosphere., 62: 1403-1410.

DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.05.016

Google Scholar