Specificity of Crack Initiation under Equibiaxial Fatigue: Development of a New Experimental Device

Abstract:

Fatigue lifetime assessment is essential in the design of structures. Under-estimated predictions may result in unnecessary in-service inspections. Conversely, over-estimated predictions may have serious consequences on the integrity of structures. In some nuclear power plant components, the fatigue loading may be equibiaxial because of thermal fatigue. So the potential impact of multiaxial loading on the fatigue life of components is a major concern. Meanwhile, few experimental data are available on austenitic stainless steels. It is essential to improve the fatigue assessment methodologies to take into account the potential equibiaxial fatigue damage. Hence this requires obtaining experimental data on the considered material and with a strain tensor in equibiaxial tension. This paper describes an experimental program on austenitic stainless steel carried out on the new experimental fatigue device FABIME2 developed in the LISN in collaboration with EDF and AREVA. This new device allows accurate quantification of the effects of both equibiaxial strain state as well as structural parameters (such as mean stress) on the fatigue life. It also allows studying the complexity of combinations between potential detrimental effects like surface roughness, mean stress and equibiaxial loading. Different load ratios can be tested by adjusting the loading conditions. A Finite Element Modeling is performed in order to obtain a precise description of the strain state in the specimen. The results of the on-going test campaign will be presented.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 891-892)
• Pages: 1329-1334
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.891-892.1329
• Online since: March 2014
• Authors: Soumaya Bradaï, Cédric Gourdin, Stephan Courtin, Jean Christophe Leroux, Catherine Gardin*
• Keywords: Crack Initiation, Equibiaxial Loading, Fatigue

References

[1] A. Fissolo et al., Crack Initiation under thermal fatigue : an overview of CEA experience, Part 2 : Application of various criteria to biaxial thermal fatigue tests and a first proposal to improve the estimation of the thermal fatigue, Int. Journal of Fatigue, vol. 31(7), pp.1196-1210, (2009).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.11.018

[2] Lefebvre D.F., Hydrostatic Pressure effect on Life Prediction in Biaxial Low-cycle fatigue, Biaxial and Multiaxial Fatigue, EGF 3, (1989).

[3] Parsons, M. W. Et Pascoe, K. J., Development of a biaxial fatigue testing rig, Journal of Strain Analysis, 10, N° 1, pp.1-3, (1975).

DOI: 10.1243/03093247v101001

[4] Shimada H., Shimizu K., Obata M., Chikugo K. & Chiba, M., A new biaxiaI testing machine for the flat specimen and a fundamental study on the shape of the specimen, Technology Reports, Tohoku Univ., 42. N° 2, pp.351-369, (1976).

[5] Poncelet M. et al., Biaxial High Cycle Fatigue of a type 304L stainless steel: Cyclic strains and crack initiation detection by digital image correlation, European Journal of Mechanics A/Solids, (2010).

DOI: 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2010.05.002

[6] C. Gourdin, A. Fissolo, F. Balestreri, Crack initiation under an equibiaxial fatigue, development of a particular equibiaxial fatigue device, Transactions of SMIRT 21, 2011, New Delhi, India.

DOI: 10.1115/pvp2013-97200

[7] RCC-MX, Recueil des Règles de Conception et de Construction des matériels Mécaniques des réacteurs expérimentaux, CEA/AREVA-NP/AREVA-TA, (2008).

[8] S. Bradaï et al., « Crack initiation under equibiaxial fatigue, development of a particular equibiaxial fatigue device » presented at the ASME-PVP Conference, Paris, July (2013).

DOI: 10.1115/pvp2013-97200