A Deviatoric Stress-Strain Function for Fatigue Life Analysis

Article Preview

Abstract:

The Smith-Watson-Topper (SWT) parameter was originally suggested and is still widely used to account for mean stress effects in fatigue life analysis. It is well recognized however, that the SWT parameter might be non-conservative for cyclic loads that involve relatively large compressive mean stresses. Such large compressive mean stresses can develop in notches after overloads. An energy interpretation of the SWT parameter is presented first. Based on analogy with the Neuber’s rule a new deviatoric formulation of the SWTD parameter is proposed. It is found that for positive mean stresses and moderate negative mean stresses the original SWT parameter and the proposed deviatoric SWTD parameter yield similar results. At large compressive mean stresses and non-proportional biaxial fatigue, the deviatoric SWTD parameter demonstrates a fairly good correlation to test data while the original SWT parameter results in wide scatter.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 891-892)

Pages:

797-802

Citation:

Online since:

March 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] N.E. Dowling, Mechanical Behavior of Materials, fourth ed., Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, (2013).

Google Scholar

[2] R. Stephens, A. Fatemi, A.A. Stephens and H.O. Fuchs, Metal Fatigue in Engineering. John Wiley, New York, (2001).

Google Scholar

[3] K.N. Smith, P. Watson and T.H. Topper, A stress-strain functions for the fatigue of metals, Journal of Materials, 5 (1970) 767-778.

Google Scholar

[4] F. Lorenzo and C. Laird, A new approach to predicting fatigue life behavior under action of mean stresses, Mater. Sci. Eng. 62 (1984) 205-210.

DOI: 10.1016/0025-5416(84)90223-4

Google Scholar

[5] N.E. Dowling, Mean stress effects in stress-life and strain-life fatigue, 2nd SAE Brazil International Conference on Fatigue, Sao Paulo, Brasil, SAE Paper No. 2004-01-2227, (2004).

DOI: 10.4271/2004-01-2227

Google Scholar

[6] A. Ince and G. Glinka, A modification of Morrow and Smith-Watson-Topper mean stress correction models, Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct. 34 (2011) 854-867.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2695.2011.01577.x

Google Scholar

[7] T. Zhao and Y. Jiang, Fatigue of 7075-T651 aluminum alloy, Int. J. Fatigue 30 (2008) 834-849.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.07.005

Google Scholar

[8] H. Neuber, Theory of stress concentration for shear strained prismatical bodies with arbitrary non linear stress strain law, J. Appl. Mechanics (December 1961) 544-555.

DOI: 10.1115/1.3641780

Google Scholar

[9] Z. Zeng and A. Fatemi, Elasto-plastic stress and strain behavior at notch roots under monotonic and cyclic loadings, J. Strain Analysis, 36 (2001) 287-300.

DOI: 10.1243/0309324011514476

Google Scholar

[10] M. Sakane, S. Zhang, T. Kim, Notch effect on multiaxial low cycle fatigue, Int. J. Fatigue 33 (2011) 959-968.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2011.01.011

Google Scholar

[11] B. Atzori, F. Berto, P. Lazzarin, M. Quaresimin, Multiaxial fatigue behavior of severely notched carbon steel, Int. J. Fatigue 28 (2006) 485-493.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.05.010

Google Scholar

[12] S.K. Koh and R.I. Stephans, Mean stress effects on low cycle fatigue for a high strength steel, Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct. 14 (1991) 413-428.

DOI: 10.1016/0142-1123(91)90677-q

Google Scholar

[13] J.L. Koch, Proportional and non-proportional biaxial fatigue of Inconel 718, Technical Report 121, College of Engineering, University of Illinois, Urbamna-Champaign, July (1985).

Google Scholar