Numerical Simulation of Fatigue Crack Growth Rate and Crack Retardation due to an Overload Using a Cohesive Zone Model

Abstract:

In this work, a numerical method is pursued based on a cohesive zone model (CZM). The method is aimed at simulating fatigue crack growth as well as crack growth retardation due to an overload. In this cohesive zone model, the degradation of the material strength is represented by a variation of the cohesive traction with respect to separation of the cohesive surfaces. Simulation of crack propagation under cyclic loads is implemented by introducing a damage mechanism into the cohesive zone. Crack propagation is represented in the process zone (cohesive zone in front of crack-tip) by deterioration of the cohesive strength due to damage development in the cohesive element. Damage accumulation during loading is based on the displacements in the cohesive zone. A finite element model of a compact tension (CT) specimen subjected to a constant amplitude loading with an overload is developed. The cohesive elements are placed in front of the crack-tip along a pre-defined crack path. The simulation is performed in the finite element code Abaqus. The cohesive elements behavior is described using the user element subroutine UEL. The new damage evolution function used in this work provides a good agreement between simulation results and experimental data.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 891-892)
• Pages: 777-783
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.891-892.777
• Online since: March 2014
• Authors: Sarmediran Silitonga*, Johan Maljaars, Frans Soetens, Hubertus H. Snijder
• Keywords: Cohesive Zone Model, Crack Retardation, Damage Mechanics, Fatigue Crack Growth Rate, Fatigue Crack Propagation

References

[1] P. C. Paris, M. P. Gomez, and W. E. Anderson. A rational analytic theory of fatigue. The Trend in Engineering, 13: 9, (1961).

[2] N. E. Dowling and J. A. Begley. Fatigue crack growth during gross plasticity and the J-integral. In ASTM STP 590 Mechanics of Crack Growth, (1976).

DOI: 10.1520/stp33940s

[3] O. E. Wheeler. Spectrum loading and crack growth. J. Basic Eng., 94(1): 181, (1972).

[4] W. Elber. The significance of fatigue crack closure. In ASTM STP 486 Damage tolerance in aircraft structures. American Society for Testing and Materials, (1971).

DOI: 10.1520/stp26680s

[5] D. S. Dugdale. Yielding of steel sheets containing slits. J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 8: 100, (1960).

[6] G.I. Barenblatt. The mathematical theory of equilibrium cracks in brittle fracture. Adv. Appl. Mech., 7: 55, (1962).

[7] C. Shet and N. Chandra. Analysis of energy balance when using cohesive zone models to simulate fracture processes. J. Eng. Mater. Technol., 124: 440, (2002).

DOI: 10.1115/1.1494093

[8] A. Needleman. An analysis of decohesion along an imperfect interface. Int. J. Fracture, 42: 21, (1990).

DOI: 10.1007/bf00018611

[9] J. Lemaitre. A course on damage mechanics. Springer, Berlin ; New York, 2nd rev. and enl. edition, 1996. 96015592 (Jean), Jean Lemaitre ; with a foreword by H. Lippmann. ill. ; 24 cm. Includes bibliographical references (p.

[222] and index.

[10] K. L. Roe and T. Siegmund. An irreversible cohesive zone model for interface fatigue crack growth simulation. Eng. Fract. Mech., 70: 209, (2003).

DOI: 10.1016/s0013-7944(02)00034-6

[11] B. Wang and T. Siegmund. Simulation of fatigue crack growth at plastically mismatched bimaterial interfaces. Int. J. Plasticity, 22: 1586, (2006).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2005.09.004

[12] T. Zhao, J. Zhang, and Y. Jiang. A study of fatigue crack growth of 7075-T651 aluminum alloy. Int. J. Fatigue, 30: 1169, (2008).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.09.006