Effect of Anodizing in Surface Finishing on Speed Boat Impeller Made of Aluminum

Article Preview

Abstract:

Aluminum alloy have been used for machine components in many functions and sizes. Every part need to be strong and long life, but when wear should be considered, then one have to hardened the surface, usually the harder the surface, the longer the life. One of the components that mention above is speed boat impeller. The sea water may cause the surface of the impeller eroded. Base on that reason the impeller should be hardened to extend its life. The anodizing process was chosen to improve the surface quality of the aluminum to reduce abrasion/erosion. Aluminum is a special material, other metal will be damaged or being worse when corroded, but Aluminum oxide is harder then the pure aluminum. In this process we use H2SO4 solution and the range of the anodizing temperature were changed gradually. This process was using single electrical force 20 Volt, to serve the anodizing for several minutes. All specimens finally were tested in Vickers micro hardness tester, also in Ogoshi High Speed Universal Wear Testing Machine. The last but not least, we cuts the specimens to see the thickness of the oxide layer by SEM. The result shows that for both hardness and wear, the quality of the surface increase with the increase of the solution of H2SO4, and also better for longer anodizing time. The thickness of the oxide layer was measured using SEM, at five places, and the average of the thickness is 2.662 mm.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

253-256

Citation:

Online since:

February 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] F. Li, L. Zhang, and R.M. Metzger, On the growth of highly ordered pores in anodized aluminum oxide, Chem. Mater. 10, 9 (1998) 2470-2480.

DOI: 10.1021/cm980163a

Google Scholar

[2] L.R. Krishna, A.S. Purnima, and G. Sundararajan, A comparative study of tribological behavior of microarc oxidation and hard-anodized coatings, Wear, 261, 10 (2006) 1095-1101.

DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2006.02.002

Google Scholar

[3] Y.C. Choi, J.Y. Hyeon, and S.D. Bu, Effect of anodizing voltages and corresponding current densities, Journal of the Korean Physical Society, 55, 2 (2009) 835-840.

DOI: 10.3938/jkps.55.835

Google Scholar

[4] M. Saeedikhani, M. Javidi, A. Yazdani, Anodizing of 2024-T3 aluminum alloy in sulfuric-boric-phoshoric acidsand its corrosion behavior, Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China 23(2013) 2551-2559.

DOI: 10.1016/s1003-6326(13)62767-3

Google Scholar

[5] S. Theohari, Ch. Kontogeorgou, Effect of temperature on the anodizing process of alumium alloy AA 5052, Applied Surface Science 284 (2013) 611– 618.

DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.07.141

Google Scholar

[6] L. Bouchama, N. Azzouz, N. Boukmouche, J.P. Chopart, A.L. Daltin, Y. Bouznit, Enhancing aluminum corrosion resistance by two-step anodizing process, Surface & Coatings Technology 235 (2013) 676–684.

DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2013.08.046

Google Scholar