Morphology and Mechanical Property of Epoxy-Clay Nanocomposites Prepared by Ultrasonication

Article Preview

Abstract:

Epoxy-clay nanocomposites have been synthesized using organically modified montmorillonite nanoclay, Nanomer I.30E as nanoreinforcement in diglycidyl ether of bisphenol A (DGEBA) epoxy using ultrasonication. X-ray diffraction and TEM analysis showed that the interlayer spacing of clay increased as a result of sonication mixing. It was observed that the morphology of the resultant nanocomposites were dominated by disordered intercalated morphology with some ordered intercalated structure. Tensile tests results illustrated that while the addition of nanoclay increased the modulus of elasticity, noticeable reduction in strength and failure strain was observed. Fractographic analysis was curried out for the tensile fracture surfaces using SEM which illustrated that the roughness of the nanocomposites surface were high compared with the smooth surfaces of the pure epoxy indicating an improvement in the fracture toughness. It also demonstrated that during tensile loading for nanocomposites the cracks were initiated at either clay aggregates or microvoids which explained the reduction in strength for nanocomposites.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

41-46

Citation:

Online since:

April 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] C.A. May: Epoxy Resins: Chemistry and Technology (Dekker, New York 1988).

Google Scholar

[2] K. Wang, S. Zhou, Z. Jiang and X. Zhu: Advanced Materials Research Vol. 418-420 (2012), p.670.

Google Scholar

[3] P I. Xidas and K. S. Triantafyllidis: European Polymer Journal Vol. 46 (2010), p.404.

Google Scholar

[4] M. Al-Qadhi, N. Merah, K. Mezghani, Z. Khan, Z.M. Gasem, and R. Sougrat: Advanced Materials Research Vol. 652-654 (2013), p.159.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.652-654.159

Google Scholar

[5] S. Ghafarloo and M. Kokabi: Advanced Materials Research Vol. 123-125 (2010), p.145.

Google Scholar

[6] M. Al-Qadhi, N. Merah, and Z.M. Gasem: Journal of Materials Science Vol. 48 (2013), p.3798.

Google Scholar

[7] N. Merah and M. Al-Qadhi: Advanced Materials Research Vol. 652-654 (2013), p.167.

Google Scholar

[8] L. Wang, K, Wang, L. Chen, Y. Zhang, C. He: Composites: Part A Vol. 37 (2006), p.1890.

Google Scholar

[9] S.A. Gârea, H. Iovu and A. Bulearca: Polymer Testing Vol. 27 (2008), p.100.

Google Scholar

[10] M. Al-Qadhi, N. Merah and K. Mezghani: Key Engineering Materials Vol. 471-472 (2011), pp.415-419.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.471-472.415

Google Scholar

[11] M. Al-Qadhi, N. Merah, Z.M. Gasem, N. Abu-Dheir and B.J. A Aleem: Polymer Composites (2013), in Press.

DOI: 10.1002/pc.22664

Google Scholar

[12] B. Akbari and R. Bagheri: European Polymer Journal Vol. 43 (2007P), p.782.

Google Scholar

[13] A. Yasmin, J.L. Abot and I.M. Daniel: Scripta Materialia Vol. 49 (2003), p.81.

Google Scholar

[14] T.J. Pinnavaia and G.W. Beall: Polymer–clay Nanocomposites (John Wiley & Sons, New York 2000).

Google Scholar

[15] C. Chen and T.B. Tolle: Journal of Polymer Science Vol. 42 (2004), p.3981.

Google Scholar

[16] M. J. Adinoy, N. Merah, N. Al-Aqeeli  and Z. Gasem: Key Engineering Materials Vol. 471-472 (2011), p.490.

Google Scholar

[17] S.R. Ha, K.Y. Rhee, H.C. Kim and J.T. Kim. Colloid and Surfaces A: Physicochemical Engineering Vol. 313-314 (2008), p.112.

Google Scholar

[18] B. Qi, Q.X. Zhang, M. Bannister and Y.W. Mai: Composite Structures Vol. 75 (2006), p, 514.

Google Scholar

[19] H. Miyagawa and L.T. Drzal: Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology Vol. 18 (2004), p.1571.

Google Scholar