Influence of Deformation Rate on Mechanical Response of an AISI 316L Austenitic Stainless Steel

Article Preview

Abstract:

Austenitic stainless steels are often used for components in demanding environment. These materials can withstand elevated temperatures and corrosive atmosphere like in energy producing power plants. They can be plastically deformed at slow strain rates and high alternating or constant tensile loads such as fatigue and creep at elevated temperatures. This study investigates how deformation rates influence mechanical properties of an austenitic stainless steel. The investigation includes tensile testing using strain rates of 2*10-3/ and 10-6/s at elevated temperatures up to 700°C. The material used in this study is AISI 316L. When the temperature is increasing the strength decreases. At a slow strain rate and elevated temperature the stress level decreases gradually with increasing plastic deformation probably due to dynamic recovery and dynamic recrystallization. However, with increasing strain rate elongation to failure is decreasing. AISI 316L show larger elongation to failure when using a strain rate of 10-6/s compared with 2*10-3/s at each temperature. Electron channelling contrast imaging is used to characterize the microstructure and discuss features in the microstructure related to changes in mechanical properties. Dynamic recrystallization has been observed and is related to damage and cavity initiation and propagation.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

49-54

Citation:

Online since:

May 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] J. Pettersson, H. Asteman, J. Svensson, L. Johansson, KCl Induced Corrosion of a 304-type Austenitic Stainless Steel at 600°C; The Role of Potassium, Oxidation of Metals. 64 (2005) 23-41.

DOI: 10.1007/s11085-005-5704-3

Google Scholar

[2] R. Viswanathan, K. Coleman, U. Rao, Materials for ultra-supercritical coal-fired power plant boilers, Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping. 83 (2006) 778-783.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2006.08.006

Google Scholar

[3] J. YIN, Z. WU, Corrosion Behavior of TP316L of Superheater in Biomass Boiler with Simulated Atmosphere and Deposit, Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 17 (2009) 849-853.

DOI: 10.1016/s1004-9541(08)60286-4

Google Scholar

[4] H. Oh, Determination of rupture time and strain rate in creep by means of the uniaxial tensile test, J. Mater. Process. Technol. 59 (1996) 294-296.

DOI: 10.1016/0924-0136(95)02172-8

Google Scholar

[5] F. J. Humphreys, M. Hatherly, Recrystallization and Related Annealing Phenomena, Elsevier Science \& Technology Books, Oxford, 1996.

Google Scholar

[6] E.I. Poliak, J.J. Jonas, A one-parmenter approach to determining the critical conditions for the initiation of dynamic recrystallization, Acta Materialia. 44 (1996) 127-136.

DOI: 10.1016/1359-6454(95)00146-7

Google Scholar

[7] D. Samantaray, S. Mandal, C. Phaniraj, A.K. Bhaduri, Flow behavior and microstructural evolution during hot deformation of AISI Type 316 L(N) austenitic stainless steel, Materials Science and Engineering A. 528 (2011) 8565-8572.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2011.08.012

Google Scholar

[8] I. Gutierrez-Urrutia, S. Zaefferer, D. Raabe, Electron channeling contrast imaging of twins and dislocations in twinning-induced plasticity steels under controlled diffraction conditions in a scanning electron microscope, Scr. Mater. 61 (2009) 737-740.

DOI: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.06.018

Google Scholar

[9] P. Rodriguez, Serrated plastic flow, Bulletin of Materials Science. 6 (1984) 653-663.

Google Scholar

[10] K.G. Samuel, S.L. Mannan, P. Rodriguez, Serrated yielding in AISI 316 stainless steel, Acta Metallurgica. 36 (1988) 2323-2327.

DOI: 10.1016/0001-6160(88)90331-8

Google Scholar

[11] M. Calmunger, MSc-thesis: Effect of temperature on mechanical response of austenitic materials, LIU-IEI-TEK-A-11/01236-SE. (2011).

Google Scholar

[12] M. Calmunger, G. Chai, S. Johansson, J. Moverare, Influence of Dynamic Strain Ageing on Damage in Austenitic Stainless Steels, CD room, proc. ECF19. (2012).

Google Scholar

[13] S.L. Mannan, K.G. Samuel, P. Rodriguez, Influence of temperature and grain size on the tensile ductility of AISI 316 stainless steel, Materials Science and Engineering. 68 (1985) 143-149.

DOI: 10.1016/0025-5416(85)90403-3

Google Scholar

[14] M. Calmunger, G. Chai, S. Johansson, J. Moverare, Damage and fracture behaviours in advanced heat resistant materials during slow strain rate test at high temperature, USB flash drive, proc. ICF13. (2013).

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.592-593.590

Google Scholar

[15] W. Roberts, B. Ahlblom, A nucleation criterion for dynamic recrystallization during hot working, Acta Metallurgica. 26 (1978) 801-813.

DOI: 10.1016/0001-6160(78)90030-5

Google Scholar

[16] T. Sourmail, Precipitation in creep resistant austenitic stainless steels, Materials Science and Technology. 17 (2001) 1-14.

DOI: 10.1179/026708301101508972

Google Scholar