Appraisal of Strengthening Cost for Increasing Flexural Strength of Reinforced Concrete Slab Bridges in Thailand

Article Preview

Abstract:

The highway live loadings, HS20-44, stipulated by Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) are different from Thai truck weights according to government gazettes issued by Department of Highways. This article aimed to study the strengthening costs of the bridges due to Thai trucks. The reinforced concrete solid slab bridges with the span length ranging from 5 to 10 meters were selected to study. It was found that the bridge responses due to Thai trucks were greater than those from AASHTO loads. The average strengthening costs were approximately 6,958 Baht/sq.m and highest at 7 m-span length. The results of this study would be a reference data to create an alternative plan for bridge strengthening in Thailand in order to sustain the bridge safety level recommended by AASHTO.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 931-932)

Pages:

490-495

Citation:

Online since:

May 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] AASHTO, AASHTO Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges, 17th Edition, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. Washington DC, (2002).

Google Scholar

[2] Department of Highways, Declaration of Director of Motorways, Director of The National Highways, and Director of Concession Highways: Forbidding any vehicles with weight, net weight carrying, over weight on each axle, or any damaged on the highways, motorways, and concession highways, The Government Gazette, Special session at No. 122. 150d. (2005).

DOI: 10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.28599

Google Scholar

[3] Department of Highways, Declaration of Director of Motorways, Director of The National Highways, and Director of Concession Highways: Forbidding any vehicles with weight, net weight carrying, over weight on each axle, or any damaged on the highways, motorways, and concession highways (Vol. 2) in 2009, The Government Gazette, Special session at No. 126. 92d. (2009).

DOI: 10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.28599

Google Scholar

[4] Tabsh, S. W. and Tabatabai, M., Live Load Distribution in Girder Bridges Subject to Oversized Trucks, J. of Bridge Engineering. 6 No. 1 (2001) 9-16.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1084-0702(2001)6:1(9)

Google Scholar

[5] Sritanet, S. and S. Attasaeranewong, Structural Safety of Superstructure of Don Muang Tollway Project Due to Thai Truck Loads, Proceeding of the 16th National Convention on Civil Engineering. 1999, Chonburi, Thailand.

Google Scholar

[6] Vivithkeyoonwong, S. and K. Rimdusit, A Comparison of Bending Moments and End Shears of Simple Span Bridge Girders Due to The Ten-Wheel Truck with the AASHTO Standard Truck. Proceeding of the 43th Kasetsart University Annual Conference. 2005, Bangkok, Thailand.

Google Scholar

[7] Suparp, S. and P. Joyklad‏, A Study on Load-Carrying Behavior of Simple-Supported Bridge Due to Thai Truck Loads, Kasem Bundit Engineering J. 1 No. 1 (2011) 33-48.

Google Scholar

[8] Suparp, S. and P. Joyklad‏, A Comparison of Internal Forces of Simple Supported Bridges Due to Thai Truck Loads with AASHTO Highway Loads, Research and Development J. of the Engineering Institute of Thailand, 22, No. 1 (2011) 25-35.

Google Scholar

[9] Suparp, S. and P. Joyklad‏, A Comparison of Maximum Responses of Three-Span Continuous Bridges Due to Thai Trucks with AASHTO Highway Live Loadings, KMUTT Research and Development J. . 34 No. 3 (2011) 317-334.

Google Scholar

[10] Priestley, M. J. N., Seible, F., Xiao, Y. and Verma, R., Steel jacket retrofitting of reinforced concrete bridge columns for enhanced shear strength. 1: Theoretical consideration s and test design, ACI structural J. 91 No. 4 (1994) 394-405.

DOI: 10.14359/9885

Google Scholar

[11] Pimanmas, A. and Pornpongsaroj, P., Peeling behavior of reinforced concrete beams strengthened with CFRP plates under various end restraint conditions, Magazine of Concrete Research. 56 No. 2 (2004) 73-81.

DOI: 10.1680/macr.2004.56.2.73

Google Scholar

[12] AASHTO, Manual for Condition Evaluation and Load and Resistance Factor Rating (LRFR) of Highway Bridges, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington D. C., (2003).

Google Scholar