The Study of MTO Online Manufacturers' Guaranteed Delivery Time Model with Order Batching

Article Preview

Abstract:

To MTO on-line manufacturers, one of the most popular time-based competitive strategies is to widely advertise a uniform delivery time guarantee to all the customers. While providing time guarantee can be an effective marketing approach, it is critical for firms to reduce lead time to keep the promise. Decreasing lot size in batching is one of the most important levers to compress lead time in operation. This research expands existing blanket delivery-time guarantee models by integrating operation approach and marketing approach. The online manufacturers guaranteed delivery time model with order batching is established. Some analytic results are provided, and numerical examples are conducted to provide further insight into the problem. The effects of batch processing setup cost, unit inventory holding cost and unit compression cost of transportation time are analyzed. The results indicate that when batch processing setup cost decrease, unit inventory holding cost or unit compression cost of transportation time increase, the online manufacturer should decrease the lot size and shorten the guaranteed delivery time. The customers time and price sensitivities have adverse influences on the manufacturers delivery time decision.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

824-829

Citation:

Online since:

May 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] So, K.C., Song, J. -S.: Price, delivery time guarantees and capacity selection. European Journal of Operational Research, 1998, 111, 28—49.

DOI: 10.1016/s0377-2217(97)00314-7

Google Scholar

[2] Chandra P, Gupta S.: Managing Batch Processors to Reduce Lead Time in a Semiconductor Packaging Line. International Journal of Production Research, 1997, 35 (3): 611-633.

DOI: 10.1080/002075497195623

Google Scholar

[3] Magretta, J.: Fast, global and entrepreneurial: Supply chain management, Hong Kong style—an interview with Victor Fung. Harvard Business Review, 1998, 76 (5), 102—114.

Google Scholar

[4] Gupta, D., Weerawat, W.: Incentive mechanisms and supply chain design for quick response. Working Paper, Division of Industrial Engineering, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Minnesota, MN, December(2000).

Google Scholar

[5] Weng, Z.K.: Manufacturing lead times, system utilization rates and lead-time-related demands. European Journal of Operational Research, 1996, 89, 259—268.

DOI: 10.1016/0377-2217(95)00268-5

Google Scholar

[6] Stalk, G., Hout, T.M.: Competing Against Time: How Time-Based Competition is Reshaping Global Markets. The Free Press, NY(1990).

Google Scholar

[7] Dewan S, Mendelson H.: User Delay Costs and Internal Pricing for a Service Facility[J]. Management Science , 1990, 36 (12): 1502-1507.

DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.36.12.1502

Google Scholar

[8] Palaka K, Erlebacher S, Kropp D H.: Lead Time Setting, Capacity Utilisation, and Prioing Decisions under Lead Time Dependent Demand[J]. lIE Transactions, 1998, 30: 151-163.

DOI: 10.1080/07408179808966447

Google Scholar

[9] Rao A R, Bergen M E, Davis S.: How to Fight a Price War[J]. Harvard Business Review, March-April, 2000, 107-116.

Google Scholar

[10] Ray S, Jewkes E M.: Customer Lead Time Management When Both Demand and Price Are Lead Time Sensitive. European Journal of Operational Research, 2004, 153 (3): 769-781.

DOI: 10.1016/s0377-2217(02)00655-0

Google Scholar

[11] Rosander K. Design of Production Systems for Batch Production in Short Series to Reduce Lead Time[J]. International Journal of Operations&Production Management, 1992, 12 (4): 53-60.

DOI: 10.1108/01443579210011606

Google Scholar

[12] Christoph H. Glock.: Lead time reduction strategies in a single-vendor–single-buyer integrated inventory model with lot size-dependent leadtimes and stochastic demand. Int. J. Production Economics 136(2012), 37–44.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.09.007

Google Scholar